Another “white nationalist” group of wannabe terrorists turned out to be a bunch of Kremlin’s b#tches. Just like Breivik who was trained by ruskies, Tarrant with his obviously pro-Russian attitude or their more peaceful “euro-sceptic” colleagues who regularly come to occupied Crimea and terrorist-ruled Donbass to kiss Putin’s KGB ass. Of course such cases are used by MSM to show how noble and honest leftist leaders are – while things like Clinton’s uranium deal, Obommie the Commie’s career, Merkel’s lackey escapades,BLM-Russia cooperation, Russian support for leftist riots in Chile and countless other examples of leftists at Kremlin’s service are being silently swept under the rug. (One of the most interesting links in aforementioned publications, a report by Peter Kreko “Comrades for peace, equality and neutrality: pro-Russian far-left parties in Europe”, is dead so I’ve uploaded its copy right HERE.)
Where is the real Russia collusion?
The way to answer that has been known since long ago, yet the West still fails to understand it for the most part.
There is no official communist ideology in Russia anymore but there are world domination plans which were never abandoned by its government of crooks, elected by nation of congenital serfs. And they indeed evolved with its showoff embrace of democracy. Now, Kremlin thugs do not support only either commie or Nazi fanatics, EU lovers or haters, Christians or Muslims, Republicans or Democrats, liberals or conservatives etc. Their persistent, KGB-made subversion plan is to recruit as many treacherous scumbags as possible to take control over ALL opposing groups, to inflate existing contradictions up to the stage of full-scale civil war, then finally roll in on their tanks to “normalize” the situation. Such is the nature of terroRussian politics and currently, no faction or religion is immune to it.
Everyone in MSM crowd seems to be obsessed with Trump’s Russia collusion those days. Considering Trump’s former overly friendly stance towards Kremlin, those concerns could have been legitimate indeed – if not some inconvenient (for MSM) fact: all their indignant vigilance suddenly evaporates when the subject of discussion is Obama or Clinton, no matter of their russian resets, red lines, uranium deals and just plain, blatant attempts to sovetize their own country.
Contents of the following post are well-known amongst the Old Guard anti-communists, but it’s never too repetitive to spread such a word amongst those who still don’t know. All credit belongs to original authors and The Contemplative Observer (nickname at WordPress) who did the following transcript of the recorded interview.
JEFF NYQUIST’S INTRODUCTORY WORDS: Welcome to another edition of ‘Outside the Box’. I am Jeff Nyquist, your host. And tonight I have two special guests: Tom Fife, an American businessman and physicist, and Anne Leary, a conservative blogger from ‘backyardconservative.blogspot.com’. The thing that’s interesting about these two stories is the way that they dovetail and work together, and perhaps even make us afraid. Perhaps some of you remember Whittaker Chambers, who was a communist back in the 1930s who turned around and ended up coming before American authorities to expose Alger Hiss, former Assistant Secretary of State, as a communist agent. We now know also, because of other Soviet spies that turned against their network, that Harry Dexter White, the Secretary of the Treasury appointed by Harry Truman, was also involved in a spy network, two spy networks actually, that were in Washington at the time. More than half a century ago, they called it ‘The Red Scare’. You may remember the name Joseph McCarthy, and McCarthyism. Joseph McCarthy was a United States Senator who said that communists were infiltrating the government. He held hearings, but in those hearings, appearing on television, Senator McCarthy looked like a bully, and so it got a bad name looking for communists. But the communists, they were infiltrating the United States, they were subverting it, because the business of communists is revolution. And what we have is a book named “The Web of Subversion [: Underground Networks”] by James Burnham [orig. John Day Co., New York 1954; reprint i.a.: The Americanist Library, 1965], which describes how this process works. James Burnham himself: a former communist. We now know in more recent times that the head of the CIA for watching the former Soviet Union, Aldrich Ames, was actually a Soviet agent himself. We know that Robert Hanssen of the FBI, who was responsible for watching Russia for the FBI, was also a Soviet and then a Russian agent himself. The ability of the Russians to penetrate the most sensitive positions in enemy intelligence services and enemy governments is well-documented in the history of the Cold War. And so I make this my introduction to show people that these things are not fantasy. These spy stories are not just make-belief, they’re real. I will be back with my first guest, Tom Fife, and he’s going to tell you a story about possible communist infiltration of the American political system. I will be back after these messages. [ – commercial break – ]
JEFF NYQUIST: Well, here we are on ‘Outside the Box’, and I’ve got a very special guest, a man, a businessman, a physicist, an American, who has experience working in Moscow, overseas, he had Russian business associates, and he has a very interesting, illuminating story to tell, and I want to welcome Tom Fife to the show. Tom, are you there?
TOM FIFE: Yes, I am.
NYQUIST: Tom, tell us a little bit about your business background. Now, you are trained as a physicist, and you’ve worked with developing some of the technology in handheld devices, I understand.
FIFE: Particularly programming for the early versions of the pen computers.
NYQUIST: And you have one time got involved in a sort of a joint-venture project with Russians back in the early 1990s. Maybe you can tell us a little bit about that.
FIFE: Yes. Well, it grew out of an episode where I met an Englishman who was doing relief work for the Russians back when it looked like the society was about really to collapse back in about ’91, and he talked to me whether I could go over with him to help them, and in the process of doing all that work I got to know some of the people who were involved in the Russian Academy of Science, and these guys were all physics types too, and so we had an affinity for, you know, for each other, we had common interests and everything. And they were a lot of programmers themselves, and they told us that they were very keen on trying to get a connection with some Western companies and maybe doing some joint ventures with them. And that indeed was what we ended up doing.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm. And in early ’92 or so –
FIFE: Well, the British guy had a consultancy doing accounting, and he built up an umbrella corporation that was British, that the Russians and our American group would be under.
NYQUIST: So, you set the stage kind of what you were doing in Moscow in ’92. Maybe you can describe a very interesting experience you had. You were at a dinner party in Moscow?
FIFE: Yes. We had been in Moscow, and we had been working with these people, getting everything organised. And, it turns out that the Russians already had constructed this little company of their own, that was within the Russian Academy of Sciences. And, so we just had a hook into that, so to speak. And the head of that little company was a physicist, and his wife, they were the heads of the company, the people we actually worked with directly.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: And we were on our way back home, and – as is pretty common tradition, you know – before you go back you always have a little kind of good-bye party. And that’s what this was. We were called gathered together, some of the Russians and the Americans that were there, the British guy was there, and we had this little party in the physicist’s and his wife’s apartment, the flat there.
NYQUIST: And so you guys were eating and drinking and making toasts, I assume.
FIFE: Yes, it’s a Russian tradition to do these toasts, and the way they usually do it is they’ll work around the table, and everyone will have their turn, and they’ll pour a little bit of Vodka out, you know, they’ll give their toast, everyone tosses it back, and then after a little bit more discussion then the next guy down the line will go ahead and propose a toast, and they’ll go along. And we were doing that, and we were eating our meal at the same time. And just have, you know, just have a general discussion, it was just a light-hearted thing.
NYQUIST: And so, eventually somebody gives a toast that provokes an interesting, more interesting kind of discussion; or a monologue, perhaps.
FIFE: It turned into a monologue, yes. My American friend, who was there with me, he for whatever reason didn’t want to propose the toast, he just wanted to go ahead and say what he thought about things; about observations he had made, about being in Russia. And for some reason he was caught by the different racial types that he saw in Russia, I think he thought that they would be more homogeneous or something. But there is a little bit of variety in the Russian people.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: And one of the things that he was noting was high cheek-bones in some of them. And so he was remarking about the influence of the Mongols and stuff like that, and I think it was that point that the wife took a little bit of offence at. And, I know that they’re a little bit sensitive about the whole Mongol thing, you know, they were subjugated for 400 years or something like that; and it’s not something they look at very fondly. But the whole thing they were talking about here really ended up being her response to that remark, that she wanted to correct him on what a true Russian is, racially. And she described what she called a round Russian face, and she was talking about what villages you can go to to actually see, you know, to see the perfect Russian. And one of the funny things was somewhat she was like describing herself.
NYQUIST: Now, this is the wife of the head of the Russian company from the Academy of Science that you were working with.
FIFE: Correct.
NYQUIST: So, she is responding sort of sensitively about this remark about Russians having Mongol features?
FIFE: Yes. And – you know, she didn’t get out of control like: ‘wow!’ But you could tell that she was miffed, and she started to say things like, “You Americans should talk about race or something. Look at your race relationships back home!” And she was particularly talking about, you know, the black problems we have, you know, the riots, and then she said, “Well, you’re going to be quite surprised because you’re going to have a black president very soon.” And, of course, when she said something like that, it was kind of a surprise, because, you know: How would she know!
NYQUIST: Yeah, how would she know, and, you know, it’s interesting, just, I’m remembering, you told me before off-air that this conversation occurred in February of ’92, and I’m remembering that the Los Angeles riots, in relation to the Rodney King affair, happened, I think, in January of ’92, if I’m remembering right, or maybe that was earlier in February ’92, but it was about that same time.
FIFE: I think you’re right. It was very close to that.
[The Rodney King incident happened in fact on March 3, ‘92. The Los Angeles riots lasted from April 29 till May 4, ‘92, following the acquittals of 3 police officers who had been filmed whilst using excessive force against African American traffic law offender Rodney King, which document brought the case nationwide attention.]
NYQUIST: So she’s going on about “You are going to have a black president …
FIFE: Hmhmm.
NYQUIST: … one day.” Now we do have one. Now, this is very curious. So, what did she go on to say? And did any of the Russians there try to stop her from going on in this direction?
FIFE: Well, the other Russians in the room were, I would say, subaltern to her, and they just sat there and were riding it out.
NYQUIST: Now, when you say they were subaltern to her, that there was some kind of power that she had, she was some kind of special person?
FIFE: Well, what they’d told me was that she was an apparatchik of some sort, within the Communist Party …
NYQUIST: Aha.
FIFE: … and that she was doing what they call climbing two ladders.
NYQUIST: I see.
FIFE: I got the impression she was one of these people who would be in a group and she would be the Party contact for them.
NYQUIST: Now, that’s interesting because in February of ’92 the Communist Party Soviet Union had been disbanded! [!!!!!]
FIFE: Yeah.
NYQUIST: So, that is very interesting.
[The CPSU had been formally “dissolved”, i.e. went into hiding, shortly after the staged “August Coup”, as early as August 29, 1991. The remaining “non-Communist” USSR was then formally “abandoned”, i.e. relabelled as the CIS, during December 1991. – Thus, this “little” detail alone CONFIRMS the seamless Soviet-Communist continuity after 1991 to this very day!!! – There has remained, though, a Communist Party of the Russian Federation under Gennady Syuganov, which constitutes one faction in the fake party pluralism of “post-Soviet Russia”. In fact, they all represent branches of one and the same old CPSU! “Russian” democracy is a mere play with labels, nothing else. It’s the same old Soviet Union in a new guise.]
NYQUIST: So they were kind of afraid of her, or they kept their distance from her?
FIFE: Yeah. In general, my observation was that they didn’t trust communists in general. But they really didn’t trust anybody who had been up the ladder at all.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm. Sure.
FIFE: They didn’t like it at all.
NYQUIST: Sure. It’s a power system, it was a dictatorship, and of course those people make you afraid because where there is power there is also people being killed and being pushed around, and power is a terrifying thing.
FIFE: Yeah, I heard all kinds of stories about different things that the Party people would do and get away with, you know.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: And, so they just sat there with their heads down and, just like I said, were kind of waiting it out. They didn’t participate at all. And from that point on – you know, they had been talking a little bit before – when she was talking and doing her thing here, they were quiet.
NYQUIST: Now, what about her husband? Did he try to stop her?
FIFE: Ah, yeah. About the time that she was saying this thing, ‘Give us a little revelation’, the way she did, he did step up and say, Well – not exactly how he put it – but he was trying to say: How about dropping this, and we do something else or something, and she brushed him off and said, no no, she wasn’t done yet, she had something else to say.
NYQUIST: Hmm.
FIFE: And so, he just kind of moved to the side, and actually he was the one also who seemed like to be just waiting it out, just let her finish with what she was going to say and forget about it.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm. So, what was her explanation in her predicting that there was going to be a black President in the United States?
FIFE: Well, the next shill that she dropped after that was: not only was he going to be black, but that he was going to be a communist, “a Soviet”, she said.
NYQUIST: She called him a Soviet?
FIFE: Yes, she called him a Soviet, yeah.
NYQUIST: That’s quite remarkable. That means not just that he’s a communist with a small ‘c’, it means he’s a Communist with a big ‘C’! [!!!]
FIFE: That’s what it would imply, I think. Yeah. And then she said, you know, she made a comment about: We had a chance to vote for a woman for Vice President, she said, but we didn’t take it. And she was saying that that was one of the reasons that she knew that we were still backwards and not being enlightened and everything.
NYQUIST: Yeah. And of course she is referring to Geraldine Ferraro, who was a Vice Presidential candidate with Walter Mondale in 1984.
FIFE: That’s immediately what I was taking it to be. Yeah.
NYQUIST: Yeah. Until this last election where Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was on, I think that was the only other female on a Presidential ticket.
FIFE: Yeah, at least a major ticket, yeah, yeah. And then I think I said something like, “Well, you don’t vote for Vice President, you vote for the President.” And she just walked right over that, and she started talking about this guy that was going to be President. And, first, you know, it was just this ‘fact’ that ‘We’re gonna have this black president’. But then she started talking about him and about the fact that “Oh, this isn’t idle talk,” she says. So, he exists, he has been groomed to be President. And, she said, he has been groomed to be irresistable. And he will be President.
NYQUIST: Hmm.
FIFE: And she said that he had a white mother and he had a black African father.
NYQUIST: Hmm. And so she specifically identified the mother as a white American and the father as a black African.
FIFE: Yes. And she seemed to think that there was something magic in having a black African and not a black American as a father, that she thought that this was great because then he wouldn’t have anything slave baggage to go along with it.
NYQUIST: I see. So, in her Russian mind, not really understanding American politics, she thought having ancestors who’d been in slavery would have been a handicap for someone who were running for the Presidency.
FIFE: Correct.
NYQUIST: Interesting.
FIFE: And I thought it was funny all said and done. That was one of the places when he got a lot of study from, I think, American blacks. They felt like he had side-stepped the whole slave issue somehow, and they didn’t, you know, like he wasn’t quite black enough, or something. I remember there were jokes about that going around at the time.
NYQUIST: So, did she give a name for this black politician they were grooming to be President, that she called “a Soviet” person?
FIFE: Yes. And, she named him as being “Barack”.
NYQUIST: Hmm!
FIFE: And, I thought it was a strange name for, you know, to be coming up with an American President, that he had that name. But then, I said, from what I remember it’s an Arabic word, it means ‘blessing’ or something. And it’s [?] Hebrew, similar Hebrew word, I think like ‘baruch’, they are all related words.
NYQUIST: Right. Right. Yes.
FIFE: And I said that I think it meant something like ‘blessing’, or something, had something to do with ‘blessing’, or something. And she said, “Yes!” She said that “He IS a blessing!” And she said, I remember she [?] dramatically, this is one of the things when she went a little bit dramatic when she said that, and he’ll be a blessing for our world efforts, or “a blessing for world communism,” I think that’s what she said.
NYQUIST: Hmm. So, did you find it strange that it was an Arab word that was the name of a supposed black President?
FIFE: Yeah, at first, you know, later on, you know, you can see the connection: well, okay, a lot of blacks in Africa are Muslim. But when I said “Arab”, she corrected me. She insisted it was “African”.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: Then I thought, well, okay, I let her go on, you know, she is convinced it’s an African word. But I knew that was Arabic origin.
NYQUIST: So, she has gone so far as to –, did she provide a last name for this future black President?
FIFE: Yeah, she was a bit, a little bit muddled on that. I think she knew it, but then couldn’t remember it quite correctly because she said maybe she was getting that country and his last name confused, that’s what she said, but she said that she thought that it was “Uganda”. And I said, Uganda, yeah, I was thinking: ‘Uganda’, you know, could be named after a country, but she didn’t say “Kenya”, but she said “Uganda”. So, I’m thinking that she got that confused with “Obama”.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: I think that she just couldn’t remember the name quite correctly, and maybe in her mind, when she heard “Obama”, she thought “Uganda”; and that’s what stuck in her head, maybe.
NYQUIST: Hmm.
FIFE: But, she did say definitely “Barack”. And it was this thing that sounded like “Obama”.
NYQUIST: Interesting, interesting. I am Jeff Nyquist, and with me is Tom Fife, he’s an American businessman and physicist who has worked in the computer field, and he’s been telling us about a dinner party in Moscow in February of 1992, where a Russian woman came up with this extraordinary statement that “You are going to have a black President some day soon.” And we will be back with more after these messages. Stay tuned. [ – commercial break – ]
NYQUIST: Alright, we’re back. I’m Jeff Nyquist, and with me is my guest, Tom Fife, an American businessman and physicist who has worked in Russia, and we are going to continue with his story, a very unusual story, about a dinner party in Moscow in February of 1992, where a Russian woman, who’s part of the Communist structures in the former Soviet Union that apparently survived the collapse of the Soviet Union [!!!!!], got sort of miffed during a dinner party in description of a Mongol racial influence in the Russian population and came back with this, “Well, you Americans, you have your racial problems”, and then came up with this extraordinary statement that “You are going to have a black President some day soon,” and of course actually describing a man who has a white mother, an African father, whose name is Barack, who is a Communist, she said, and described him as “Soviet,” which implies that he has some kind of relationship with Moscow.
FIFE: Yes.
NYQUIST: And, Tom, when you said that ‘Barack’ means something like ‘blessing’ in Hebrew or Arabic, she came back with, yes, he will be a blessing to the communist global struggle, whatever.
FIFE: That’s exactly her synonym.
NYQUIST: Yeah. And it’s extraordinary because in 1992 Barack Obama was not even in politics yet. He wasn’t introduced as the chosen successor for a State Senate seat until 1995, when Alice Palmer, who was by the way an admirer of the Soviet Union and very close to a lot of communists and attended the 27th Communist Party Congress in the Soviet Union [of February/March 1986, where the Fourth Party Programme of the CPSU was adopted, that reflected the beginning of the new phase of the communist long-term deception strategy known as ‘perestroika’ and directed by Gorbachev], announced Barack Obama as her successor. Interesting fact! And that announcement, by the way, was made in Bill Ayers’ living room, Bill Ayers being a former Weather Underground terrorist who –, one of his statements about his terrorism is, “I am a communist!” So, this is very interesting and kind of scary that this communist lady in Moscow in ‘92 is aware of this guy that is not even going to be chosen yet for three years to stand for a State Senate seat. What else did she say about this future American President? Anything more specific?
FIFE: Yeah, she seemed to me very intense on trying to drive home the idea that this was a real person, and she knew about him. And she didn’t just go with the name and, you know, Mum and Dad. First she came to the home [?] and was about trying to remember, first she thought Northwest, and then she said, no, no, no, “He is from Hawaii,” and then she said that he had been schooled in the schools of the Presidents, she said he’s “Ivy League”, that’s how she referred to it.
NYQUIST: Ivy League. Hmm.
FIFE: And she said that he was in New York and Chicago and had gone to school in California, and she said that he was currently in Chicago, that’s where he was.
NYQUIST: Interesting. Because Barack Obama attended Occidental College in California, then Columbia in New York, and worked in New York, I believe, three years after graduating, and then moved to Chicago after that.
FIFE: She also said that he was –, soon he was to be entering politics, and it sounded like, it actually sounded like she was saying: everything was under control, you know, like he’s gonna check all his boxes and he’ll climb the ladder, and be President.
NYQUIST: Wow! Did she say anything about his ever visiting the Soviet Union? Did you get the impression that he’d been to the Soviet Union?
FIFE: You know, she didn’t, no. She didn’t say about him being –, if she had, I wouldn’t have been surprised by how much she knew. But she did not say that.
NYQUIST: This is very interesting. I think I mentioned it to you before when we were talking off-air, but Barack Obama’s parents, you know, they met in a Russian class! That’s how they met. In 1960, I believe, was the year that they met, and in that class. They were both taking Russian in Hawaii! It is kind of funny: You hear this from a Russian, and Barack Obama exists because his parents were studying Russian. So, Tom, how did it end, how did she end this monologue she gave about this future black President, how did she kind of conclude, how did it end?
FIFE: Let me say, she –, it was a series of, like I said, a series of details that she was giving that would show that she knew this fellow, and –, oh, the other thing that she said was that, the way she put it was: America was at the same time the big stumbling block for communism plus its biggest hope and that America had to be brought over for everything to work worldwide. [!!!!!]
NYQUIST: Hmm.
FIFE: And so, that, she said, that had to take place. And it was going to take place. And, I think, that was one of the most frightening things about it, was because there wasn’t just a woman mounting off. She had this chilling certainty about it, a self-assuredness about everything she said. That had almost more power than, in some respects, than the words she said. She was just so certain! And it was like foregone conclusion.
NYQUIST: And how did you and the British man and the other American, that were there, how did you receive this information?
FIFE: I think the other two guys were seeing it a little bit more encouragedly than I did. I think I was the one who was probably taken the most abacked by it, for some reason. I think I felt chilled about it.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: The British guy, particularly, is the one that I had a little bit of conversation with, and he remarked that, you know, that all your life you’re growing up you hear everyone talking about communists and taking over the world and everything, and he said, you should all be darn if I just sat here and heard a communist say that they were about to take over the world. And that was his biggest remark about it; the fact that she felt, how I should say, she kind of felt [?]. But my American friend, he didn’t, I don’t remember hearing him remarking anything about it. The only conversation I remember afterwards was only just between me and the Brit.
NYQUIST: Hmm. And, it would be really fascinating if he could be gotten to talk about this now. Have you tried to talk to your British contact? Have you been able to get hold of him?
FIFE: I’ve been, you know, it’s been near almost twenty years that this took place, and it’s kind of a cold search, but I have been getting some help there, and I was able to at least a little bit have contact there with the British guy, and he said he absolutely didn’t want to have anything to do with this. He said he didn’t want to talk about it and he didn’t want to be involved.
NYQUIST: And, so, he didn’t feel any responsibility to talk about it at all that this had happened and that it was –, I mean, when you talked to him, did he remember the incident?
FIFE: He, well, actually I didn’t think we had a chance to really get very much in that direction. I was trying to get him to maybe talk about it somehow, but he didn’t want to talk about it really. And he just said he didn’t want to have anything to do, you know, because I was saying, “Hey, could you just maybe give a little bit of colour of veracity to what I’m saying because, so far, it was like, you know: This is one guy talking.” And –
NYQUIST: So you called him up, and you said, “Hey, I’ve been on the radio, I’ve been talking about what this Russian woman said at this party.”
FIFE: Yeah. Repeatedly, people will always ask and said, “Well, you know, if we can get something else to be lined up here, you know, that says the same thing, it’ll give it a little bit more strong story and everything. But, he definitely left me knowing that he didn’t want to be involved.
NYQUIST: So he was very quick to brush it off and do not want to –
FIFE: Yeah.
NYQUIST: I see. And what about the other American that was there that kind of inspired the whole thing by talking about Mongols?
FIFE: Well, you know, I’m not sure [laughs]. We had this company together, and the whole thing collapsed right afterwards. It was because of the Russians that the whole thing collapsed.
NYQUIST: Now, that’s interesting to me because I’ve interviewed other businessmen who’ve had dealings in Russia, and the one theme that comes out is that the Americans or the British or the Swedes or whoever it is, they have this big investment in Russia, they have Russian partners, and what then invariably happens is that the Americans or the Swedes or the British lose their money, and the Russian partners end up with everything. Is that kind of what happened to you?
FIFE: Yeah, there was a group of Russians that we were with, and then this other group, to me they came out of the blue, I just was not involved in the whole process of the organisational side of things, I was much more on the technical side. And I was involved with doing the technical things, and the other people were involved with the business side. Somehow they brought in this other guy, who was a Russian, he was with the University of Moscow, and it was through him, or it was actually to him and around him, that everything started to aggregate, and he ended up in control. And I’m not sure of all what went on, but that’s what in the end happened.
NYQUIST: Hmm. Interesting. And, so, the party wrapped up, she’d made these statements, and what interested me and what I think our listeners are wondering is: Okay, you heard this very strange story, it kind of spooked you at the time. How long was it before you realised that this Barack person you heard about, this black American politician, was a real person and that you could see him on TV or read about him or notice he was actually there?
FIFE: Yeah, of course when I went home, at the time I had an act of security clearance.
NYQUIST: Oh! Because you were defence contractor of some kind?
FIFE: Yes, I was involved in another company that had an act of security clearance going. And so whenever I went to Russia, when I got back, I had to be debriefed by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the DIA.
NYQUIST: Right.
FIFE: And an agent would come in scheduled time, and we would chat, and basically before I would go over, he had said, that he wanted to make sure that I would make notes of anybody that I might meet, particularly ones that wanted to be friendly with me, things like that, and so I did that. And so I kept a little diary of what went on when I was over there.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: And, I did make notes of this conversation because it did strike me so strongly.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: And I did go –, I was debriefed with the guy when I got back and ended up giving him the little notes I’d made on an evening when I got home. But, you know, this was a very vivid thing. It was in my head. As a matter of fact, it was actually so vivid that when I got home, one thing I did do is that I told my son, who was, you know, 12, 13, 14 something at the time, I mentioned to him that, I said, you know, if I’m not around in the future at some time and you hear about a guy, this guy who wants to be President, he’s half white and half black, I said, you got to fight this guy! Because, I just told him enough, I said, he is gonna be no good. And one interesting thing of course is that my son remembers that conversation we had. That’s one point of reality that’s very vivid with him, and he says that’s one thing that he remembers very well because I guess it kind of affected him that I pulled him aside and I felt something strong enough to tell him that. And that stuck with him. Now, of course, with me in the meantime it was just a story, for years and years and years. And I didn’t see this guy, you know, sticking his head up anywhere. And so, it just kind of, you know, stuck in the back of my mind, and every once in a while I think about it, I remember it, you know, something would remind me of it, and an interesting thing that did cause it to pop up in my head every a couple of times since then, when she was describing him, back at the dinner, and she said he was half-white and half-black, she stopped and said, “That’s right, he’s a chocolate baby!” And I thought that was such a queer thing to say, you know, I just didn’t think of –, you know, it’s not in my vocabulary, like [?] people refer to a lot of this stuff [?] every once in a while, but it was an eye-turner phrase for me, and I’ve heard it yet a couple of times since, and when I did hear that, I nearly remember this woman saying it, you know.
NYQUIST: Yeah, it’s a kind of unusual thing to say.
FIFE: Yes, so it stuck in my head, and it has been a trigger a couple of times for me to start thinking about it again. But, what really did it was of course when I saw him at the Democratic National Convention when he gave that famous speech of his.
NYQUIST: In 2004.
FIFE: Yeah, I think, it’s that Purple-speech that people keep talking about, We aren’t red or blue any more, or purple, or something, I don’t know.
NYQUIST: Yeah. I think so, yeah. Because in 2000 he didn’t have any, or any previous Democratic Convention, he didn’t have any platform at all.
FIFE: Yeah. But even there it didn’t register exactly with me because the only thing I knew then was, okay, here is a black guy, his name is Barack, and that, that DID get my attention, and it was afterwards that I started hearing people talk about all the –, you know, they were praising him, actually it was kind of surprising how overflowing with lauding they were doing, that they just couldn’t stop to praise him enough, and then they were talking about how he was a Presidential hopeful, perhaps, you know, and all that type of stuff, and then it was later, not long after that, I started seeing little bio kind of clips on him, and the one that did of course, the very second they talked about him having a white mother and a father from Kenya; that just like: Oh oh! It was like, as if something snapping, you know, hit you in the head, that’s what it felt like. It was like: Oh my God! You know – it was a story! All of a sudden it didn’t seem like a story any more.I felt like: God, I’m right in the middle of something real! And, it really struck me, and, you know, after that I started googling things about him, and everything matches, I mean everything she said connects with the reality of this guy!
NYQUIST: Well, you must have had quite a shock then to realise this person was real and that they were considered to be Presidential timber.
FIFE: Yeah. And, at first it was still kind of like, I was kind of like simmering on the back-burner about this thing, and I have to admit I had an anxious feeling about it, and I felt like: How can I say to anybody what’s going on. So I started saying, you know, I would be with some friends, and I’d go and say “Hey, I got to tell you this story I got …” They half believe me, and they half wonder whether I was making this stuff up, or something.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
FIFE: I think the problem is it was enough after the fact, that it wasn’t like I was predicting that much, at that point in time, so –
NYQUIST: No. Now you’re talking about when he started to announce for Presidency and run in the primaries?
FIFE: That’s when I said, I just dropped everything and said I got to get something, get this word out. When I could see that he really was moving towards the nomination. That’s when I really started.
NYQUIST: So that was what: April; or March or April of 2008?
FIFE: It was, yeah, spring of ’08. Yeah.
NYQUIST: And, what did you do? Did you write to newspapers? Did you call radio shows? Did you notify TV stations? How did you approach it?
FIFE: I wrote e-mails to everybody you can think of. All the big names, like all the mogul names, I wrote e-mails to them, wrote paper letters to them.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm. And, did you get any responses?
FIFE: Ah — No. [laughs]
NYQUIST: Wow!
FIFE: No –
NYQUIST: No interest at all??? And, well, in these letters or e-mails you’d write to them: Was it a teaser? Did you tell the whole story? What did you do in these letters?
FIFE: Well, when I started off, you see, I don’t know why, but I didn’t want to just start broadcasting it out total clock, I don’t know why I did or didn’t, maybe that’s good or bad, one way or the other, but I didn’t. And I, the –, the first batch of letters were saying, “I got something that I want to tell you, and it’s very important about Barack Obama,” and I’m not sure [?] I said, maybe that was about it, his background, or something. And no one seemed to care, you know. Maybe they were just flooded with letters like that. Maybe there is enough people out there who have their own little versions or something, I don’t know, but I got no response at all. What actually got something going, finally, was a friend of mine has this rather large e-mail list, a political oriented one, conservative political oriented, and I wrote up a little paragraph, and it’s a paragraph I have out on a website right now, not a paragraph, but a –, it’s the little stories that I have, kind of what I just related, and I have it out there on internet, and it was that text then that I was able to get on to her mailing list. And I did get a little bit of response from that, and eventually it got down to Wiley Drake. And he asked me to come on his show, but I couldn’t get on until actually election day; mid election day, when that little thing took place. And then from him there was an interview with a lady at ‘WorldNetDaily’, Janet Folger [now Janet Porter]. She quoted my figurehead I have on the internet, and after that there was a lot of e-mail to me, and people were asking questions and actually a lot of people were starting to reinforce, they said, “Oh, you know, that I was involved in this and that and the other,” and here’s an example, one of the letters I got, I mentioned in the write-up I had that one of the things that she said was that the three important cities in America for them was New York, Chicago, and San Francisco. She was talking like San Francisco was of some particular importance, and I didn’t understand what she was saying – whatever she was saying just didn’t make a lot of sense to me. And I mentioned just that much in the write-up, and I got an e-mail then from someone who said, “I know what she’s talking about, it was the Gorbachev Institute that was started at the Presidio.” And I got an e-mail then from a lady who said that she was hired by them to write some programming for them. And that’s what she thought it was, this Gorbachev thing.
NYQUIST: So, Tom, tell me about your –, you say you have a website. Let’s give out the web address so that people, listeners can go visit it and maybe read what you have on there.
FIFE: Yeah, it’s a website that my son put together for me, and it’s www.americantownmeeting.com, and it’s just all run together as one word, “americantownmeeting”.
NYQUIST: And, well, I want to thank you, Tom. You are very brave for coming forward with this story. And I know those who disbelieve you will say you’re very evil for coming forward with this story, but you’re certainly brave. And, you know, when I first heard this story, heard about this story, I thought it would have to be a hoax, and then I heard your interview tonight, thought twice, and I have a Ukrainian friend who listened with me, and he, to his mind your details were so authentic to him, being someone who lived the first half of his life in the Soviet Union, that he said this has to be true. And that’s his view on it. So I thought I had to have you on the show, and I had to interview you, and I thought it’s important to add this to the public record so that people can think about it, because it’s a testimony of a witness. The listeners can determine the credibility of the witness, that’s their responsibility, but I think that the witness has come forward, and we need to listen to the witness. So I want to thank you for coming on the show.
FIFE: I want to thank you very much for having me. It’s something I think it –, you know, you put yourself in my shoes: I have to come forward. I can’t imagine waking up in some future time not having come forward, or at least tried to get it across, and to see what maybe have happened to the country and everything, and I have been quiet, you know, silent, and the whole thing. I have to come forward. That’s the way, I just have to.
NYQUIST: Yeah. It makes perfect sense. Well, thank you, Tom, Tom Fife, for being with us on the show today, and I’ve got another guest after the break with more on Barack Obama’s background. [ – commercial break – ]
JEFF NYQUIST: I’m Jeff Nyquist. We’re back. It’s ‘Outside the Box’, and with me in this segment is a conservative blogger of “backyardconservative.com”.
ANNE LEARY: “.blogspot.com”.
NYQUIST: Ah. Okay. “backyardconservative”, okay. It’s Anne Leary, and say it again, it’s “backyardconservative ?”
LEARY: “.blogspot.com”.
NYQUIST: “.blogspot.com”! Okay.
LEARY: But you can just search it, and you’ll find it. If you just search for “backyardconservative”, it’ll come up.
NYQUIST: And it’s a very interesting blog, and it’s –, Anne is very politically active at the local level, I take it, and –
LEARY: Not so much now, but I used to be quite a bit more. Now I just BLOG!
NYQUIST: Now you just blog. And, so, anyway, Anne, you’ve made some little bit of news lately among the conservative bloggers, and I was forwarded a piece, an interview done with you by AmericanThinker about an encounter that you had with the infamous Bill Ayers in the Ronald Reagan Airport in Washington some time ago. Could you maybe tell our listeners about that?
LEARY: Sure. Yeah, it was about a week ago, on Monday, and it was in the morning, and I was headed back from Chicago, I’d been there for a meeting, and then I look up while I was having a coffee at Starbucks before I went through the security, and I look up and I see this kind of scruffy-faced guy who, you know, he looks a little older, and he had a backpack, and I thought: Wow! This is not your normal, you know, 60+ year-old. And I looked at him, and he got closer, and then I saw yet that earring in his ear, and I thought: THAT’S BILL AYERS!!! So, I mean, I’ve been tracking him for, I mean, you know, his videos, and things that he said, because he’s from Chicago and he’s a good friend of Barack Obama even though the President denies it essentially. So I thought I’m gonna get a picture of him and find out where he is speaking. So I grabbed my BlackBerry, and I had to delete a picture because I had, you know, tourist pictures on there. So, I thought, okay, and I had one shot, and I followed him, and I thought, okay, I’m gonna go passed him, and I did. I turned around, planted myself, took the picture, and then I said, “What are you doing in D.C., Mr. Ayers?” And, just as I took the picture, he turned. So I was really lucky, I got his face, a pretty good shot so everybody could see it was Bill Ayers, you know, seeing the picture.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm.
LEARY: And he, you know, he gave me kind of an uneasy smile then when he realised that I was taking his picture. But after that he didn’t smile at all, and I just asked him, and he told me he was speaking at an education conference, and so I asked him where, so I was kind of fishing a little bit, okay, I thought, okay, all this kind of play along a little bit, and then I think he was trying to decide if I was a fan or not, something. So he said, “That’s what I do: education,” and speaking at this Renaissance lecture. And then he said, “You shouldn’t believe everything you hear about me! You know nothing about me!” Wow! That got me kind of mad because he is an unrepentant domestic terrorist. So I just said, “Well, I know plenty. I’m from Chicago, I’m a conservative blogger, and I’m going to post this!” Well, then I thought for sure he would just go off, you know –
NYQUIST: laughing
LEARY: and would be aggravated and go. – Well, he didn’t! He stood there, and I could see kind of a wheel turning in his head, and then he looked to me straight in the eye – and, you know, no snark, no sarcasm, no jokie stuff –, he just looked at me and he said, “I wrote ‘Dreams from My Father’!” And I said, “Ha???” I said, “So you admit it?” I mean, just like “What???”
NYQUIST: Now, just to explain to the listeners, ‘Dreams from My Father’ is Barack Obama’s first autobiographical book! [It came out in 1995.]
LEARY: Right. Right. This is like his myth-maker book, that –, you know, people voted for him, some, just on the strength of the miracle, you know, poetry of this autobiography about, you know, his father, and his upbringing. And, so, this is like a core to Barack Obama’s, his mystique as, you know, being this wonderful American-dream-kind-of person.
NYQUIST: Right.
LEARY: So, I was pretty incredulous. I mean, anyway, I said, “Oh, so you admit it, because obviously there have been rumours about this for some time.” But, anyway, then he said to me, “Michelle asked me to.” Then, I just, I’m thinkin’, Wow! That is really a stunner because he is bringing Michelle into this. He’s [?]! And, but then I thought, well, this is Bill Ayers, you know, he dances on the Flag, he dances around the truth, so, you know, I just kind of looked at him, and then he went on to say, “Oh, and if you can prove it, we can split the royalties.” So, I said, “Oh, well, fine,” I said, “Oh, stop pulling my leg!” So I thought then he would leave. He had had his little fun. But no! He came again! And this time he’s looking really serious, it’s like almost like he’s pleading with me. And he says, “I really wrote it! The wording was similar!” And so then I said, “What! I believe you probably heavily edited it.” And then he said for the third time, “I WROTE IT!” And then I got mad because I thought, well, he can prove if he wrote it or not, I mean this was written years ago, and he hasn’t said it up until now, and he’s gone along with this whole charade that, you know, Obama, you know, it’s his ‘work of his life’ to write this book. So I said, “Why would I believe you, you’re a liar!”
NYQUIST: [laughing] And he is a revolutionary communist to boot!
LEARY: Wow! Yes, falsie communist! I mean, he’s a bomber, he is a domestic terrorist! Yeah, but you can’t say, you know, come out and say a lot of this stuff even in the book said he claims he has written because there is no statute of limitations on murder, I mean there are still some cases that are open.
NYQUIST: Yeah.
LEARY: So after I’d called him a liar, then he finally realised that he couldn’t say much more to me. So then he walked off, but he just kind of talked over his shoulder, “Well, if you can prove it, we’ll split the royalties.” So, you know, the way I figure it, I think he wanted to get this out there, but he wants plausible deniability, I mean, it’s my word against his, but –
NYQUIST: Right.
LEARY: – you know: He said it. I reported it, just as he said it.
NYQUIST: He wanted to get it off his chest to somebody, but he wanted it to be deniable.
LEARY: Right. Right. But then it’s kind of interesting because, you know, initially people are like questioning the –, you know, my veracity, that I, so that supposedly that I wouldn’t make this whole thing up. Well, that’s kind of ridiculous. Why would I do that? I mean, I’m not putting my credibility on the line for Bill Ayers!
NYQUIST: laughs.
LEARY: But, but then, you know, I think that National Review found something, or the National Journal, which is the Charlie Cook inside the [?] Publication, head to head, they’ve been at some kind of, one of these lectures, and they actually asked Bill Ayers if he wrote the book, a week or two ago. And he kind of jokily said, “Oh yeah, you can quote me. I wrote it. I met with the President three or four times, and then I wrote the book. Ha ha ha.” And they kind of took it, “Ha ha ha.” Well, that never went anywhere. Nobody ever heard that he said that. I mean, they put it on one of their little blogs, and it was kind of a –, you had to pay to read it, so it just never went anywhere. And, of course, everybody thought it’s all “jokie-jokie”. So, I think what he is doing, you know, obviously there was no buzz there, he must want this out. He must want this out. I think he saw this opportunity, and he took it. And even if, you know, not many people have heard of my blog, and, you know, of course, he didn’t know me from Adam, I’m still sure that he thought, you know, the way the internet would go and given his notoriety, that it would make a buzz. And I think further, the reason, when I think he decided to tell me, because I was a conservative blogger, and he figured it would get around, and, you know, actually it didn’t just go around the conservative blogosphere, I think this was in his calculation, the only way the mainstream media would pay attention to it is if it did go around the conservative blogosphere. Because, you know, he would have plausible deniability, and they would want to debunk it. But it would still get out there! It would still get buzz. And –
NYQUIST: So people would be left to wonder whether he wrote it or not.
LEARY: Right. And, you know, I mean it wasn’t just a question of yanking the conservative blogger’s chain. He is yanking President Obama’s chain! You know.
NYQUIST: laughing
LEARY: He is like [?], and he brings Michelle in there! And, you know, in fact, I got like 30,000 some hits on this thing. And it went up on to the top of the memorandum, which is the kind of the buzz, it’s more liberal biased buzz, to the point where the New York Times Caucus Blog called me a “stalker”. They felt like they had to attack me. You know, Bill Ayers is the victim here, of course! You know.
LEARY: Yeah, so, anyway, I think people pretty much believe that it went down the way I said because there’s no way I’m a stalker, I only met the guy the first time. And it was clear when I posted that I was very skeptical. And I said I was. So, people can make up their own minds, but it’s clear to me that he wants this out there. And in fact, after all, said and done, I actually do think he wrote it, but I don’t think he’ll admit it any time soon.
NYQUIST: Hmhmm. Interesting. Anne Leary of “backyardconservative.blogspot.com,” right? Am I saying that right?
LEARY: That’s right. Very good. Thank you!
NYQUIST: Alright. Well, thank you for being with us! – I will be back after these messages. [ – commercial break – ]
JEFF NYQUIST’S CLOSING WORDS: Well, ladies and gentlemen, you’ve heard a couple of interesting stories from witnesses, and I would like to conclude by quoting Bill Ayers himself, Bill Ayers, the self-declared communist and communist revolutionary, I should say, and former member of the Weather Underground organisation, a terrorist organisation from the 1960s and ‘70s. This is what Bill Ayers said at an education conference in Venezuela recently. He said,
“This is my fourth visit to Venezuela, each time at the invitation of my comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring fighter for justice. Luis has taught me a great deal about the Bolivarian Revolution and about the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution, and I’ve come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both the Venezuelan and the international struggle – I look forward to seeing how he and all of you continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane.”
Again, that’s Bill Ayers, who in 1969 declared, “We are revolutionary communists!” Bill Ayers, the friend of our President, Barack Obama. – Bill Ayers. – Well, Bill Ayers.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us. I hope you’ll visit my website at “jrnyquist.com”, or you can go to “strategiccrisis.com”, all one word: “strategiccrisis.com”. There you’ll find videos and other information, and I hope you will join me, Jeff Nyquist, your host, on another ‘Outside the Box’ next week at the same time. Until then, God bless!
As I’ve told many times before, those who deal with thugs are bound to lose in the end no matter how fancy their dealings look like.
Each time when liberals choose themselves a new “partner” amongst criminal regimes and politicians, everyone who still has brains thinks that libtards finally managed to hit a new low. And each time, it’s a mistake. There is no such thing as “low” for a true liberal who always knows how to sink lower in his overzealous efforts to please thugs.
Remember how jolly and braggy they were about their fancy “russian reset” with thug Putin, mocking and labeling everyone who tried to oppose as “Nazi”, “moldy chauvinist”, “Cold War addict” etc? Not so loud now, when their ass-licking brought the world to the brink of WW3 and some Embassy staff to having their peace of life trashed, apartments shitted and, after complaints to thug Putin (who probably laughed his head off), asses kicked.
However, I have no slightest compassion for those harbingers of Obama-ism who got what they deserved. What everyone who deals with thugs deserves. Especially when it involves harassing people by orders of thugs.
For years of Obama’s presidency, his lapdogs in U.S. embassies have practiced face control visa policy under mawkish slogans of “partnership” and “cultural exchange”. Many young persons of non-typical (for Russia) visage got their visa petitions rejected against all rules and regulations, just because Obamaists have slient orders from Kremlin not to allow those few citizens of Russia who are not drunk imbeciles to visit U.S, or (oh deary dear) get an opportunity to stay here.
Indeed, if those few decent people would come to U.S., get a decent job, live a honest life and suddenly tell people there that Great Wise Peacemaker is really a thug-loving bullshitter, having plenty of experience to back their words, could be a true disaster for libtards. Welcoming russian filth and scum, happy with reset and in fact anything while they have enough vodka and free stuff seems to be MUCH safer for liberal asses of Obamaists. And it’s not an exaggeration. All kinds of russian scum – thugs, drunkards, prostitutes, terrorists – are being welcomed by libtards both for visiting U.S. and partying in the Embassy. All of them are getting U.S. visas without a problem.
However, hidden truth has a nasty ability to get out with quite a bang. And the uglier it was, the stronger it hurts. This time it got those who were confident about their impunity and safety, right in the kisser. That could be funny, if things much more important than safety of some dumb liberal russophile losers weren’t at the stake.
Even in the most chilly times of Cold War standoff, in the very heart of Evil Empire, ruskies didn’t dare to use such, literally, shitty methods to “show Kuzka’s mother” to their American rivals. And since the end of Cold War, Russia hasn’t become any stronger – quite the opposite. Unfortunately, Obama’s administration definitely surpassed ruskies in arts of degradation, allowing each and every small-time commie thug to bend once great country to their perverted thuggish will, fanatically considering this suicidal, treacherous grotesque appeasement-for-all policy their highest humanitarian achievement in the universe.
This is an official statement of Dr. Sergei Melnikoff regarding current events in Riga.
Fifth column’s edge. Target: Baltic countries
I draw the attention of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the Council of Europe, the Constitution Protection Bureau of the Republic of Latvia, as well as other competent bodies, on the following circumstances and persons, whose activities are aimed at undermining of the constitutional order in Latvia and in general, creation of unstable situation in entire Baltic region for benefits of Russia that is currently conducting a policy of open military and economic aggression.
Russian fifth column and its leaders in Riga joined their efforts in a choir against the international project “The People of Maidan” and its land of birth – the free Ukraine. Analysis of open sources allows to find with a high degree of reliability that this war against an international project has been coordinated by the Mayor of Riga Nil Ushakov and Modest Kolerov, the latter now living and acting under the pseudonym “Mike Collier”.
Mike Collier, or Modest Kolerov (his real name is hidden in the depths of FSB, whose director Mr. Patrushev was secretly awarded by “hero of Russia” title for murdering children in Beslan with flamethrowers and involved in bombing of sleeping apartment blocks in Moscow) in August 2012 was declared a persona non grata in Latvia due to “threat to the territorial integrity and economic security”. Before that, he was banned to enter Lithuania, Estonia and Georgia. But today this Russian emissary is roaming around the EU carelessly after losing some weight and pulling a cap over his eyes. Simple anthropometric study of Mike Collier’s and Modest Koverov’s portrait photos shows that it is the same person. It’s purely rhetorical question who helped a russian spy to return to Riga under slightly changed name, without even caring to alter physical appearance significantly.
Actions of Ushakov and Collier are coordinated with hundreds of media outlets not only in Latvia. Analysis of open sources reveals the existence of entire tree-structured network of russian-speaking media on Latvian territory, entirely controlled by hostile Russia. During my conversations with advisors in Riga on the possible purchase of “Baltkom” radio station I was told openly and directly about existence of such network and its purpose to prepare the people for “X” hour, should the “unexpected” invasion of Russian troops take place on the territory of Latvia. Constantly repeated surname “Ushakov” indicated complete lack of any attempts to conceal the actions of the Mayor of Riga, exceptionally beneficial for russian intelligence and thieves-oligarchs of this country.
Media attacks on Ukraine and socially significant projects dedicated to development of friendly relations between Ukraine and EU countries (in particular with the Republic of Latvia, like “The People of Maidan” project) are closely administrated by Ushakov-Coller group, Russian embassy in Latvia and FSB spy residents in Riga together with all more or less significant media outlets of the Russian Federation.
Hundreds of articles with groundless accusations of Ukrainian project and a series of attacks committed by so-called “vandals” right next to Latvian Cabinet of Ministers must cause deep concern not only of the supreme government bodies of the Republic of Latvia, but also of the Council of Europe, where a demonstration of “The people of Maidan” is planned.
All efforts to discredit the Government, the Seimas and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Republic of Latvia, skillfully directed by Ushakov-Coller tandem with using of the dirtiest tricks in Russian-controlled mass media, must receive competent and comprehensive assessment.
This official statement and analytical note with factual materials are being sent by me to government and counter-intelligence authorities of the Republic of Latvia, the United States and the Council of Europe.
Sergey Melnikoff, aka MFF
Author of the global exhibition project “The People of Maidan”
A new category: The Resistance. All anti-communist and/or anti-russist materials will be published here from now on.
The following article was originally posted on TFP forum as answer to Mr. Nyquist’s publication The Lie at the Foundation of Today’s Right. I’ve decided to publish it on my personal Website, as it’s the one most fit to be its compendium with thorough explanation of all my political views, which are being interpreted wrongly most of time by those who live in stereotype world or just not willing to see plain things.
——————————————————————————————————–
Who controls the past controls the future.
-George Orwell
As I already said more than once, what the world has now didn’t come out of nowhere. Neither infiltration of the Right nor weakness of the left-leaning mainstream are things brand new, unless someone completely ignores events of the last century that happened outside of the U.S.A.
It would be just stupid to suppose that KGB tyranny disappeared on its own. Fortunately at least for fellow anti-communists I write this article to, this myth has been already exposed, but the main trouble remains unresolved. I guess many people wonder how a thug country with in fact legislated serfdom and daily life comparable to some African hellhole could regain its world domination potential within about 10 years, getting a horde of supporters worldwide.
This “infiltration” has gone far enough to make a real breakup, so we can already speak about two large right-wing groups. But it’s not the worst outcome – at least, compared to Europe where the putinist right has become a mirror image of the official left and the natural right-wing movement is reduced to a few near-extinct groups, harassed by both leftists and putinists.
This “natural Right” can include individuals of different opinions, some of whom may ever deny their political affiliation, unwilling to join any of existing parties (as myself). They are united by classic centuries-old honest ideals of human Dignity, Liberty, self-defense, private property etc.
The “corrupt Right” (or infiltrated one) is another story. Their NS-like urge to join into flocks and find a Big Wise Leader to lead their herd towards Bright Future prevails upon everything. A perfect environment to find pea-brain followers for the ideology of abominations named russism.
(An important digression. Despite all changes in mass media towards easy access to all kinds of information, russists don’t even try to conceal their leftist essence. Indeed, they are feeding their supporters worldwide with right and left hands both at the same time. Both of sides feel happy, confident that Putin is a true “savior” of Christian world (or true friend of last “socialist paradise” states). This is an evident indicator of their mental capabilities. Or how it’s easy to buy someone for cheap BS and wad of Lubyanka rubles.)
It’s very noticeable that corrupt Right demonstrates extreme intolerance towards natural one, often even more ferocious than diehard leftist fanatics. The most recent example is Ukraine, where the people who just wanted to create a strong independent state (where every ethnicity willing to respect oneself and others is welcome) became a target for BS propaganda campaign of mad putinist assholes, who call themselves “conservatives” and “christians”. Either they are being whipped into this hysteria by promise of better salary from Lubyanka, or this is just panic fear of the “natural Right” emerge, which will make all putinist corruption evident, and their lackeys get deserved total contempt, which means one-way ticket to their beloved Russia.
Other example was the 2010 murder of Polish Government. President Lech Kaczynski was not only a strong leader, who could change the future of entire Eastern Europe. First of all, he was one of the key figures for the Natural Right, who opposed European neo-socialist LGBT praising mainstream as well as russist corruption. His common sense, true Faith and manliness were a true exception amongst modern Europeans.
Those digressions could be exhausting for some readers; alas, without a proper introduction the following thoughts would have been unclear, let alone reasons of my rage over Western unforgivable naivete.
PART 1. WHAT TO DO?
The West is deeply contaminated by stereotypes of “friendship” and “alliance” that have been grown, promoted and encouraged since the damned year of 1917. Now the resulting abominations got on the way of good guys, effectively paralyzing them while bad guys are enjoying with sacred cow status. Official libtard governments are working for ruskies – doesn’t matter much if willingly or just because of “non-violence” trend. Using this helplessness of authorities that discredited themselves in any way possible, Putin’s goons are multiplying their ranks worldwide. But weakness of their supposed adversaries is not a key to this disgraceful success.
There is no way to effective resistance without the truth about the past and russians know it – that’s why any attempt to investigate the true history of USSR makes them so mad (in Russia, one can get a real prison term for that). Politically correct junkies may invent a thousand explanations why Russia is aggressive and how it’s like the Third Reich. Any of those arguments will be far from real explanation likewise.
Amongst anti-russists (which are in fact, advanced anti-communists who realized the source of all trouble after watching it from within) the understanding is coming naturally, like bird’s ability to fly. Unfortunately, the West still remains mostly reluctant to use experience of people who successfully resisted against the filth of putinism, helping others to find their way and regain confidence lost in madness of modern political reality. Looks like “enlightened” Westerners still believe it’s possible to stop the plague without quarantine and elimination of the source (too “politically incorrect” methods) or just afraid to offend the nation of red thugs.
If you open ANY anti-russist Website, you find a section dedicated to Soviet history. Often it will be the main one. This is the thing each and every Western anti-communist must always remember, and here comes a reference to Orwell’s quote in the beginning.
To straighten things and undo the corruption as much as possible, one must do a review of “popular” version of History and bring century-old russian lies to complete debunk together with modern BS, which is nothing more than poor copy of their old propaganda regardless of certain subject. Russian barking about “family traditions” and “Christianity” has no more truth than Soviet slogans on “peaceful intentions”.
In a nutshell, I consider the following facts an initial basis:
So-called “russian people” (nearly 95% of modern russian population) are separate biological group of human-like specimen with inborn serf mentality, reduced mental capabilities and increased aggressiveness. Untermenschen (subhumans) created by methods of unnatural selection, never applied to any living beings by any other regime before or after. Read this interview to know the details.
So-called “great patriotic” war (russian WW2 phase) never was a defensive one. Indeed, their former Nazi buddies decided to strike only after they detected serious preparations for bolshevist assault on Europe. Victor Suvorov explains it all in “Icebreaker”.
Despite the nature of National Socialism, we must give them a credit: they had working “what if” plan in contrast to modern partners of Russia, whose pitiful attempts to resist leave them pants down in front of rabid bear. And if not “evil Nazi invasion”, USSR would have extended its territory until Portugal coastline. By supporting the Evil Empire during WW2, the West made a terrible mistake, causing much more trouble for everyone than it would have been if Third Reich ended up as winner in Europe.
So-called “Cold War” has been an excuse for turning a half of Europe into russian bloody playground, and so-called “nuclear balance” for peace was nothing but elitist utopia. Trusting a weapon of equal power to mad thugs without any moral code is a suicide. By missing the opportunity to destroy the USSR before they got the nuke blueprints, the West sentenced itself to life in constant fear and gave Russia another chance for the world domination.
So-called “perestroyka” has been a global hoax. No comments here.
So-called “partnership” with bloody descendants of soviet butchers and feeding brute named Russia with its neighbors (Chechnya, Georgia, Poland, Ukraine… what’s next?) for “own benefit” is nothing but a guaranteed war in the future, already on own territory. It’s not Chechnya or Ukraine, or President Kaczinsky’s head, or even Europe that ruskies want. They need THE ENTIRE WORLD to live in serfdom and misery under the reign of Kremlin’s eternal thuggish regime. Just because, see p.1. Even if at least one country that has own Dignity and Liberty remains not enslaved by Russia, ruskies will continue carrying on their insane red escapades, labeling everyone around “Nazis, Banderovites, junta, Jihadists” etc.
To admit own mistakes the West made requires courage, which unfortunately, won’t be demonstrated by the majority without a proper motivation. It’s very important to distinguish anti-russist attitude form pro-Nazi, resisting any attempt to equate those two terms – which is one of the favorite tricks of putinists and libtards (read more about that further). BTW, 3rd Reich Nazis and their modern followers never were anti-russian, but that’s another story.
PART 2. FACES OF THE ENEMY
What the West has now? Old moldy myths on USSR, making hereditary criminals immune to Justice. Politically correct mainstream idiots who prefer to rot alive in GULAG rather than “offend” ruskies, doing just what thug Putin wants (all they are allowed to say criticizing Russia is “bad evil russian government, poor oppressed LGBT”). And finally, bunch of putinist zombies who pretend to be good guys but just like libtards, they do what thug Putin wants.
In my humble opinion, the top priority areas for putinist infiltration within the Right are:
Religious communities. Still very important to Westerners and KGB knows it. During last few years, many websites had evolved into putinist playground, where valuable posts are being erased for no reason and high-rank (in forum reputation) putinist assholes followed by small-time lackeys running rampant all over the board 24/7, harassing everyone who tries to say anything “inappropriate” about their beloved thug. Needless to say, with all this encouraged by administration.
Let’s hope such places will end up with zero reputation. But the number of resources being transformed by this scheme is disturbing and the most of people don’t understand what is going on until it’s too late. Like on CAF – a former Catholic Answers Forums which should be called Commie Abominations Forums now.
US-skeptic communities (survivalists, preparationists, expatriates etc). For them, putinists sing a mantra “we don’t like U.S. and EU policy, so we must look at Russia as example. West is weak, Russia is strong.” As logic as “We hate a disease of depraved and immoral ones named AIDS, so let we infect ourselves with strong natural syphilis!” There always will be fools who follow.
Anti-Muslim communities, racists, neo-Nazis etc. crazy about “White superiority”, “Islamic danger” and other similar ideas who consider ruskies their “white brothers”. A goldmine of useful idiots. Even the facts that their beloved KGB thug Putin has a huge bunch of treacherous mercenaries from Caucasus, Moscow population is already almost one-third Asian/Eastern/Mongoloid and half of elite university staff here is Jewish means nothing to Nazi putinists. They still worship their idol, owned by Islamist thug Kadyrov, as a “savior of Western civilization”.
For the successful resistance one should know what to expect from followers of putinism and their masters. Note that I didn’t tell you should try and change putinist mind or engage into debates. All kinds of attempts to awaken the russists have been already tried, and results were much worse than zero. (The last one was IPVNews project originally targeting Russia, which helped Ukrainians instead.) Ukraine, (falsely) considered to be “Slavic sister country”, enraged russian commie serfs like no one could just by choosing Freedom, therefore proving that russism is completely incurable. If ruskies had a slightest piece of common sense and human dignity remained, the Maidan would have sparked a bigger revolution in Moscow to end Kremlin tyranny once and for all. Instead of it we see rabid neo-Soviet rampage supported nationwide, ferocious hatred towards the West and even more hatred for liberated “brothers”.
American-language (or any other non-russian) putinism is a slightly modified translation of native russism, with the same mindset, logic (if one can use this word here), tactics – everything except of cosmetic changes. The effect of using common sense on Russia has been already demonstrated. No matter where, their comrades will show absolutely same reflexes.
Arguing with putinists is like playing poker with cheater, backed by his fellow chavs who will beat the honest player, mock him and go away with money no matter what. In dirty game, there is just one way to win: Mr. Colt’s fast draw. And keeping your friends close, in case if bad guy will manage to call his buddies – both in real life and virtual reality, putinists are always afraid to be alone.
Courtesy is a virtue in the fight only when you have an arranged duel with someone of moral level comparable to yours. Many times I saw how polite naive Westerners lose their debate with loudmouth ruskies miserably, because their principles weren’t allowing them to use a sufficient counter attack.
Here comes the main danger. Putinists are no serious threat, but century-long russian lies are. Stereotypes, falsified History and fake morality tie hands of the Westerners, who consider that putinists must be treated like humans and one can have a honest fight against them.
Common people just can’t imagine that the main principle of russian debating is to have no principles at all. Russians and their lackeys say whatever their current propaganda textbook contains – a complete BS opposite to reality. Like promoting “morality”, while being a child molester (a well-known hobby of thug Putin) or speaking about Law and Order while murdering and torturing people “for fun” (just what russian terrorists do in East Ukraine now). Endless repeating of the same lies. Again, and again, and again. No matter which evidence will be demonstrated, russists keep praising their beloved “moral” pedophile, “peaceful” murderer, “humane” tyrant, “christian” KGB chav, “caring” brute. Logic is useless, let alone seeking weak spots in putinist doctrine or russian mentality – those words mean the same thing now. Like I said before, in contrast to Nazism, russism is not a structural creature comparable to humans. It is abomination created from completely homologous material. Its only weakness is fear of truth, which will bring the Justice about.
All this does NOT mean we should be just happy with our knowledge and not bother ourselves with making it a popular one. Indeed, we should follow the example of anti-russists, providing guidance, training, spiritual armor and mental weapons for those who seek, but NEVER try to find remains of good in those who chose to side with absolute evil. Only a complete idiot or scumbag can’t see (or most likely, pretend not to see) the essence of contemporary Russia.
So we must abandon the fear to “offend” the adversary and act regardless of their reaction. Speaking of ruskies, they are already offended beyond civilized imagination by their own despicable existence, crafted by no one but themselves. More than once, they have been offered Liberty completely free of charge from the West (while all civilized nations bought it with their own best blood, in wars and revolutions), but ruskies were turning back to GULAG “pakhan-schestyorka” (kingpin-bitch) lifestyle again and again, scorning naïve good Samaritans in return. Even the Nazis could not put ruskies in more humiliating conditions, and keeping that fact in silence would have been a pure hypocrisy.
(Another important digression. Russian mad hopping can be considered a kind of indicator, like Hot or Cold game. The more “offended” they look, the closer are you to the truth. When you finally discover it, there will be an unforgettable bonus of russian freakshow, where those enraged congenital serfs erupt a crazy mess of commie profanity labels, calling people “Yids”, “Banderovites”, “Nazis” and “CIA mercenaries” simultaneously (This is NOT a joke). The same comes for their corrupt comrades from the West. The closer you will be to exposing their collaboration and nature of their masters, the more enraged they become. Still in more civilized way, but revealing their true face with each new day. Here, they can even unite with mainstream leftists who are even allowed to criticize russian dictatorship (“oh, poor fellow russian LGBT…”) but will protect “good Russians, bad Putin” and “bad Germany, good allies” myths with the similar ardor. There is no need to be a genius to show this herd a direction and watch from aside how they destroy themselves while conquering their land. Just what russians do.)
THE CONCLUSION
It’s already a survival on crime-ridden planet. Lockdown, regrouping, defense.
The anti-russist community has a good permanent “border control” rule of checking someone’s doubtful personality: just ask him (or her) about thoughts on Russia, its past and present, particularly dictator Putin, events in Ukraine etc. After that, everything becomes clear. If some troll ever managed to falsify his agenda, the future activity always was revealing a true nature very quickly.
I consider the existence of Russia the ultimate trial for everyone’s conscience, to make the difference between the good, the bad and the ugly 100% evident. The test described above has no religious criteria, but was approved by Christians as well as Muslims and followers of other religions. The conscience doesn’t depend on certain religion, skin color, etc. In fact, anti-russism created the most tolerant community of completely diverse groups and individuals. (Something for the modern libtards to envy – still none of their attempts to build a “multiculture paradise” had a slightest success.)
After learning what everyone must know about Russia, no reasonable man can deny the fact: is has become an absolute evil, a threat the most vile, menacing and corrupt that the world has ever had to endure. People invented scary stories with monsters, undead creatures, kingdoms of bloody tyranny, hordes of demonic invaders… But the real abomination is already here, much worse than any fantasy nightmare. Because it’s real.
Now it’s time to make a choice. Unlike back in WW2, one can’t hide behind mainstream or make a wrong decision and go away with it to American (or any other) dream, leaving fellow Westerners to perish in bolshevik slaughterhouse.
If we are lucky, someday we’ll celebrate the Victory at the ruins of Kremlin. If not, russian thugs still won’t have a satisfaction of taking us down easily. The enemy is strong, but only by his corruption and ability to deceive. We must expose russian lies, thus eliminating the red Mordor life energy supplies and breaking the “spell” that keeps the West subdued. Then, the Victory will be just one step away.
This is my translation of another article written by Boris Stomakhin.
There are almost no straight ways left in our world. We can still hear the words of praising to Allah “who created us Muslims and blessed us with Jihad on His straight path!” only from Chechens that fight against the gruesome bloody empire. Alas, others prefer crooked paths…
It’s not about ruskies whose way is much more than crooked – it’s an endless loop of slavery and violence. The most saddening thing here is a choice of the West that abandoned its former long way of achieving and defending the Freedom for themselves and others. The Western community (parties, press, NGOs and even some parliamentary fractions) is not silent about the genocide in Ichkeria – most brutal one since the end of WW2. Honest people of the West are doing their best to help its victims. Alas, the governments, presidents and prime ministers remain deaf to the horrors of the Chechen Holocaust, caught on the oil-gas hook of Moscow.
This has begun not since yesterday. The Western idea of own safety through isolation from commie Russia with permission for russians to do what they want, in fact the right for mass murders granted to bolshevist regime in their country, appeared long before the demise of USSR. Already in the middle of XX century Ludwig von Mises, the classic and ideologist of Western liberalism, said: “Let russians be themselves. Let them do what they want in their own land. But we can’t let them to cross the borders with intentions to destroy the European civilization. Will russian people neglect soviet system or not – it’s up for them to decide. Now the country of whip and gulags is no more a serious threat to the European peace. So we can just leave them alone”.
But then something even more interesting happened. Left-right political changes in the governments of leading Western countries are not so insignificant, especially as it seems to be when looking from Russia. If the right-wing ones (followers of von Mises) at least were caring about the security of their own Atlantic civilization and defense against the aggressive barbarianism of Moscow with its satellites, the leftists came to idea of a complete surrender to commie Russia. So begun to appear the absurd and dangerous Western leftist theory of the “convergence” between capitalism and socialism with merging of their best features that (as they say) both systems have. Doesn’t matter it was supported by Sakharov – it is still absurd and dangerous.
Now we can see a culmination of this process: the legislation of so-called “European constitution” and transformation of Europe into the unified strictly centralized state. All this was beginning from quite reasonable ideas of common market, economic union and canceling of customs obstacles. But the process was seized by Western leftists that came into power in 60-70s. They were different from soviet ones just like mensheviks from bolsheviks, having the same goal but a longer and more curved way. Their creation resulted in not just some spiritual and economic union. It turned out as strict-ordered organization, intentionally created to fit the soviet structure and matching with it like parts of toy constructions set with a purpose to merge the EU and USSR in the future.
Do you remember loud slogans about “united European home” that were used 20 years ago when the perestroika started?
They meant not only some spiritual and ideological “return” of russian serfs to Europe where they never lived. As it has become clear now, it meant a deal between leftist European governments and Gorbachev’s elite to merge, or to feed the Europe to bloodthirsty red bear. Meanwhile, the nations of occupied Baltic countries (true and congenital Europeans) were longing for the European integration to become separated from Moscow.
By the way, now there are left-wing governments in the largest European countries like United Kingdom and Germany – with the majority of Labor and Social Democratic parties. The result named “European Union” actually looks like USSR in its bureaucratic unlimited power of Brussels government, planned government control for all countries and slowly forthcoming police state regime. Not only for Chechen refugees who often face humiliation and deportation threats. For Europeans their own-made “home” provides a possibility to be extradited and imprisoned despite of native laws, just for the criticism of EU and its bureaucracy or their immigration policy (this is considered a “xenophobia” and “racism” there).
In such a covert way, the ideas of common market without economical boundaries and expansion of a cultural and educational interaction between countries were replaced with a creation of soviet-like barrack-styled confederation. Even the terms are common: infamous EU “commissars” were taken from the first decades of bolshevist regime. Instead of a friendship between homes and families, everyone was forced into one communal apartment.
Results of those changes can turn up very surprising today. I already mentioned Chechens whom the official socialist Europe refuses to help despite of 10-year-long brutal genocide. Like by orders from Moscow, security organizations started to block “Kavkaz Center” and famous newspapers begun to spread Lubyanka-made bullshit about Chechens that are intended to bomb Eiffel Tower or how packs of them rushing towards Iraq to kill Western soldiers. But this was not enough: now the Moscow and its henchmen are using EU as a cudgel against the Baltic states, forcing the EU to pressure and condemn them for some non-existing “minority right violations” or memorials to the heroes who fought against the bolshevism. EU is always patient, agreed and “expressing concerns” while the court of Brussels gives orders to pay compensations to former red occupants.
With their unbounded boorishness, russians of Latvia and Estonia have created so-called “russian party of EU” (or more exactly, it was created by Moscow). This is regarding the ability of Russia to threaten the West. Von Mises considered it too weak and unable for any threats, but now its has the “fifth column” with unlimited claims in addition to agents in Western left-wing governments (Not only in Latvia or Estonia. In the ENTIRE EUROPE). With the traditional European respect to Law and Order, obedience to rules and scrupulosity in legal matters, there is a serious reason to worry that a bit later Russia will occupy Europe without a single shot – just following legal rules and laws of the EU. The EU where the leftists rule and which isn’t going to see the dangers of russian imperialism and revanchism, singing the Moscow song since the times of Gorbachev, looking into the eyes of bloody dictator and sincerely shaking his bloody hand again and again full of fidelity.
Even in the Great Britain there is an Independence party amongst other “euro-skeptics”. Just think about it! The Independence party in once a largest and most powerful empire that was deciding the fate of other nations. Alas, the socialist Moscow-pocket democracy of Brussels was able to yoke even the English lion. But the UK is the country with still no Euro currency in use, one least bound with that “European home”. If not this relative independence – neither Zakaev nor new russian dissidents like Berezovsky or Litvinenko would have been able to get an asylum there, ending up in prison like Khodorkovsky…
The recently integrated Baltic states that wanted to get there so much, considering membership as the symbol of their return to Europe now are tormented by growing prices, oppression of local farmers and economical troubles caused by the militarist economic system of forceful redistribution. As russian nazi-bolsheviks were saying at their own website, all this gives them a solid ground for provocations and spreading of pro-soviet revanchist morale amongst common people. Meanwhile, the Latvian President explains the shameful decision to visit Moscow at May 9 to celebrate so-called “victory day” (of stalinist tyranny that defeated its own and all neighbor nations) with a desire to be together with European leaders. The question is, what for and what the Latvian nation will benefit from this ass-licking. Maybe some joint ritual denouncing of “Latvian neo-Nazism and attempted historical revisionism”…
So maybe getting in the EU wasn’t worth it? Maybe yes… There is more trouble than help, and the honor is purely ceremonial. But the most interesting thing there is the full absence of the right to secede from the EU. Either in the new “European Constitution” or somewhere else. Even the soviet Constitution had this (only on the paper). But the EU has not even that.
In those dark years when the soviet dissidents were imprisoned and locked in madhouses for a slightest disagreement with the communist regime, all “progressive” activists of the West were leftists, socialists and commies. Let we take Sartre, Camus and other French thinkers for example. They never lived in soviet “paradise”, knew the Gulag from inside or were forced logging in Siberia, but were fanatically inciting youths, students and intellectuals to the achieving of “social justice” in the way usual for communists – through street riots and pogroms a la 1968, when French students were vandalizing shops and burning cars that belonged to other people.
The soviet communism was defeated officially, but it still alive behind the facade of beautiful words about democracy, “social justice” and “return to Europe” in EU as well as in Russia with its “democratic” chekist regime. As ideology, the leftism originated from the West but it was turned into the horrible virus that corrupted both Russia (which never was immune) and the West by serf russian nation with a thousand-year slave mentality, habits of blind submission, violent politics and congenital lust “to seize and redistribute” (to make everyone equal in poverty).
Communism and socialism can be truly named a syphilis of the Western world – especially of the Europe. It was infected by the bolshevist Russia during the century-long unending rape. But naïve and gutless Europeans just continue to “relax and enjoy”, so their land that once was a citadel of the Freedom is now under the new wannabe-totalitarian regime and unlimited international bureaucratic power, after having so many revolutions successful and so many tyrants overthrown!
As it known from the biology, new organs are created by the new features. Fight for Freedom that exists even in contemporary post-industrial totally controlled world will inevitably lead to the creation of a new organs, organizations, unions and other structures instead of obsolete useless UN and PACE that betrayed a Freedom mission. A new structures will rise, cause no one can take the will to Freedom from people. Those new unions won’t be created by officials in Brussels. They will grow out of the fight to mature at the battlefield under fire of russian “Grads” and mortars.
The History is full of paradoxes. Often those who are considered “freedom fighters” and overthrowers of tyrants today will build the tyranny even more cruel tomorrow, just like the bolsheviks. And those who are being called names like “Islamic fundamentalists” in enlightened liberal Europe will turn out as owners of superior Spirit, an embodiment of the true Freedom that was written on the banners of all great European revolutions, bearing it as a reminder and eternal reproach to treachery and despicable slyness of spineless Moscow lackeys…
MY COMMENT:
The article was written several years ago, so certain things mentioned by Mr. Stomakhin have changed but the general idea (and unfortunately, the leftist-russian political heading of the modern EU) still remains important, maybe even more than before.
So-called “European constitution” was never ratified but instead of it EU members legislated a set of even worse treaties made to suppress the rights of individuals and enforcement of total and international government control, like Dublin (I/II) regulations, agreement on driving license, UN-controlled gun laws etc. The Kavkaz Center website found its safe place in Sweden and keeps his fight on from here despite the mad hysteria of russian subhumans that are still trying to shut it down through the UN, attempts to murder its activists and cyber-terrorist attacks – but everything in vain.
As a political refugee, I can confirm the mistreatment by pro-russian local officials. I am not a Chechen, but when you are against russians the ethnicity barely matters for commie scum. Promoted by Kremlin and local fifth column of russian thugs, prostitutes and thieves, former soviet “nomenclature” scumbags crawled their way into all key positions of power, police and courts, hiding behind the new EU laws and “holy cow” myths that created a no-responsibility system with a face of corporate dummy and insides of bloody CheKa thug commissar. The UN is just the other russian dummy there. But my story needs some other special occasion to be told.
I am not a supporter of Islam. But I don’t believe the threat of so-called “Islamization” overblown by some modern dim-witted wannabe Nazis (BTW to know how Muslims were really treated by the Third Reich, read something from genuine History). It’s not the Islamist radicals and immigrants who seized vital human rights for free speech, honest elections, homeschooling or to keep and bear arms, swapping all of them with fake safety and showoff hippie-styled bliss. Still not completely everywhere, but this can always be enforced with some help of Eastern comrades.
So let this article be a warning to all who are still able to resist the neo-soviet threat. An example story of defeated nations, ruled by Kremlin henchmen and prepared for being hanged over to russians like a herd of sheep.
If someone keeps saying that Russia is a “friend” and how wonderful it is to live in peace and love of everybody to everybody, THIS is the time when you should be on guard. Lies is the main weapon of modern Russia and its lackeys worldwide. They can’t take the weapon out of you hands in the direct confrontation – but they can do it by convincing you that “you don’t need it, Cold War is over, so let’s be friends”.
The essence and eternal world domination intentions of Russia can be banished only together with its population of congenital slaves that keeps their commie Mordor resurrecting again and again.
When someone leaves the West with a loudass showoff to proclaim a loyalty to the land of red crime, genocide and subhuman cattle, this is nothing but a vile treason.
Speaking of old ex-French commie swine Depardieu, it could have been funny (without taking into consideration the fact of his troubleless return to the place he spat on) – just one look at this fat imbecile drunk in the company of russian natashas is enough.
But the example of that dirty commie was a kind of signal for the russophile scum worldwide. They got it straight away: no one will blast their asses for licking russian one. This is getting especially not funny when some bastard hands over to eternal commies something more important than worthless drunk himself. Like the new top russian asslicker named Snowden.
In the modern time of common sense avoiding, fun addiction and “everyone-is-oh-so-cool celebrity” trend, the last of red scumbags can go automatic on air and gather loads of fans fresh right from TV couches and out of kitchens. Or army of high-educated “elite” politically correct, RT-addicted wannabe philosopher junkies who consider even the spitting right in their mawkish faces as something to dispute about, believing the liberal tales of “human rights” – especially those are being told by russian commie thugs. Most of listeners don’t bother themselves with distinguishing the reality from commie bullshit, singing mantras how “everybody loves everybody” until the new russian Gulag will be around.
The leftist propaganda has a lifetime tradition of exaggeration, perversion and overblowing of petty facts to the scale of world tragedies to play with cheap emotions of dim-witted masses. That way, russian propagandists are barking from their country of red genocide, new Gulag and KGB at their RT channel about “evil American government” that is “spying after their own citizens”. That’s a familiar trick – last time before it reds were hopping mad about “evil Americans” who “abuse children”, feeling absolutely free to butcher their spawn with Gulag and Holodomor methods (brutal beatings and torture, rape, extermination with starving and freezing, etc.) in Russia.
It’s impossible to be that dumb to not see the hideous face and gruesome deeds of russian brute, but for somebody it’s very possible to give away the remains of own conscience for especially meaty leftover bone chunks from the kremlin table.
For those who became the lackeys of the most criminal, corrupted and lowlife nation of thugs and prostitutes, the motivation NEVER matters because there can’t be ANY of it. Only the size of sop matters here.
The end of despicable russian dog Snowden will be the same as for all commie-loving bastards before him: gallons of vodka, long row of Natasha whores, mad carousing with new thug “buddies” and final hangover in the one of torture chambers after wearing out at new KGB “work”.
But such treacherous scumbags are never able to appear out of nowhere. Just like the flesh parasites that feast on weakened, dying and ill bodies, traitors are multiplying inside ill countries, where the vital past is forgotten, the evident present is neglected and life is observed in no way but through the “magical glasses” of political correctness.
So speaking about treason next time, stop and think: isn’t that YOU who gave the bastard a chance with your own indifference and recklessness?
As true successor of criminal bolshevist USSR, modern neo-soviet Russia uses all its filthy methods but the circumstances are far more favorable for commie successors now.
For a typical Westerner who obtains “knowledge” from mass media, so-called own “free and independent” opinion is determined and limited by stupid mainstream (both conservative and liberal). Self-destroying ideology of political correctness, subhuman praising, carelessness, obsession with fun, perverted tolerance towards criminals, gun bans and “end of the Cold War” myth are the best gift russians can get from civilized world. In the society corrupted with brain deterioration, reds are able to walk freely and carry out their foul deeds without slightest fear of Justice (and if somebody will be still vigilant enough, there is always a bunch of bully activists with their stereotype “Nazi”, “evil Russophobe”, “chauvinist” labels ready to be incited).
There is no surprise that collaboration with red East and international neo-soviet propaganda became common and not only unpunished. Scumbag henchmen of neo-bolshevik brute, lowborn KGB pedophile pervert, bloody dictator Putin are producing hundreds of megabytes of mendacious propaganda to work off their kremlin sop and this is considered “freedom of information”, while in Russia, KGB thugs ban everything they don’t like.
One of such plots has been revealed on Propublica, with all corresponding MATERIALS and names of despicable traitors.
But this is only one case of many, and there is much more to come.
Recently, rote untermenschen announced a new plan of their pedophile dictator Putin and his gang, so-called “concept of soft force” with a purpose of world domination through reorganized bullshit network.
Methods of this plan are represented in four categories: further expansion of KGB branches (under phony name of “cultural centres”), aggressive (or better to say, much more aggressive than before) promotion of russian language worldwide, increased funding of kremlin propaganda for youth generation and finally, increasing of influence on Western Internet by wide use of sold-out foreigners’ barking. Red brute is in need of new henchmen and it will call for them soon.
Even with long-term traditions of theft and bribing amongst russians (most of funds will not even reach the destination, being stolen at the way), this plan is a real threat for overcivilized West without a sufficient resistance.
Red lackeys worldwide are sure that all their crimes will go unpunished and evident things can be proclaimed fake with only subhuman argument “just-because-we-say-so” – like this was in Chechnya and Georgia.
Your silence is reds’ confidence and encouraging for further aggression, more and more gruesome with each new blow of hammer and sickle. The Government and President of Poland have been butchered by russian subhumans, and almost no one gave a damn. Why? Just because ruskies are sacred cows untouchable for any Justice since their “victory upon Nazism” (which resulted in bloody bolshevist tyranny in half of Europe). In corrupt logic of a common mainstream junkie, if a man kills russian invader and says NO to their BS – he is a “Nazi” (“Jihadist”, “terrorist”, etc). But if ruskie comes to another country and kills its people – this is “protection of russian minorities”, “counther-terrorist operations” or, in the very good case “an act deserving of serious international concern”. It’s not very hard to figure out who is the author of those mantras.
Those uneasy days are the time of trial for everyone who claims to love Liberty. Russian impunity came to the point where even the Cold War wouldn’t stop them and Europe will choose surrender to GULAG rather than take a chance and at least kick some commie asses before own glorious death on the battlefield… or life in a new world, deprived from russian abomination. If we the free people from the entire world say “NO” to russian bullshit – enraged ruskie orcs will come with war. But if we won’t do that, they will come to round up everyone into a new GULAG. (Russophile bullies, both mercenary trolls and useful idiots whining about “russophobia” and “end of the Cold War” will go there first, but it barely matters here.)
If you don’t want some red drunken scumbag to became a dictator upon your land and deprive you of freedom, dignity and property, it’s YOUR personal duty to prepare and stand up against neo-soviet threat and dirty russian mercenaries. Your word can save a day in Freedom now, but if you choose to keep silence, tomorrow you may already need a gun for the same purpose.
Modern freedom stripped of conscience boundaries has its own advantages and drawbacks. Amongst first ones is the revelation of true essence, which is rarely perfect enough to be demonstrated proudly, especially with showoff exaggerated representation of one’s flaws. This is far not pleasant to look at, but it gives the true picture of one’s personal worthiness that is much more important than some fake cover.
The russophilia had became damn trendy with the resurrection of neo-bolshevik regime. Having no threat of shame and unwritten justice upon them, scum of all kinds begun worldwide neo-bolshevist worshipping to bloody KGB dictator Putin and his subhuman nation.
Of all those hordes of such brainless ass-lickers, both sold out and voluntary ones, ex-French actor Gerard Depardieu can be named a true leader of those dirt-addicted, commie-loving russophiles for whom drunken yokels, stinky muck and beastliness are more pleasant than civilized life in dignity.
Jedem das seine.
The blabbering about “too high taxes” was no more than showoff fake for stupid crowd. In his open letter to russian mass media, red frog (who now desperately tries to grow bear hair, learn to growl “russian mat” and drink “samogon” to resemble his adorable bolshevik brute) revealed his true genetic nature of red commie asshole. By his own words, communism is his own long-term family trait as well as addiction to country of cattle.
It is noticeable that comrade Frogieu decided to confess all that after completion of his successful career in France, while there is no strong anti-communist Western power to kick his red ass out to his Eastern masters tarred and feathered. He isn’t alone: shortly after he had acquired official confirmation of his vile treason (a brute’s mark named “russian passport”), red whore Brigitte Bardot threatened to follow this way because of “animal rights” scandal. Of course she liked fake show of KGB pedophile who was flying with cranes (which, by the way, ended in genuine death of two birds chopped by propeller) but “didn’t knew” about traditional russian “fun” – torture and murder of birds and animals. And people – all who do not fit in “common russian” chauvinistic subhuman stereotype.
Now comrade Frogieu will have as much time as he desires to lick commie ass of his idol pedophile Putin and worship the nation of eternal bolshevik untermenschen. Maybe even together with Bardot, competing in untermensch worshipping between each other.
The outcome of 2012 American elections is the worst event that could’ve happened in modern Western politics.
With using stupid brainwashing and brain-preparing propaganda as well as tricks which he was taught by his russian masters (from distracting nation’s attention to blunt boorishness), henchman of neo-bolshevik unholy regime succeeded in continuation of his corrupted reign upon the country which once was the stronghold of anti-communism and hope to many civilized nations in their struggle against russian world domination intentions.
To complete a new training course in serving more hard to russian untermenschen, Obama will make a visit to his red comrades in Moscow as soon as possible.
If his plans to “be more flexible” (for twisting according to russians’ will) could’ve been stopped at sight in the case of Romney’s victory, now it will require much more efforts and the outcome will be still uncertain.
Obama, Clinton, Merkel, Berlusconi, Komorowski, Ivanishvili and other political russophiles – all those puppets of Kremlin are providing help to neo-soviet horde better than elite squad of intelligence agents by forcefully turning once great and proud independent nations of their countries into meek and mindless herd, which is unable to gather any serious resistance against horde of red neo-bolshevik brutes which are about to rush towards West, following their predatory lust of destruction, murder, rape, looting and brutality.
Wherever the russophiles are making their foul deeds, all their methods are similar to each other with a resemblance that is hard to miss.
Support for all kinds of scum and lowlife parasites with simultaneous oppression of middle class and qualified specialists, gun bans, promotion of homosexual perverts as superior class of society, destruction of traditions and national dignity, war against religion, corrupted anti-justice on ethnicity basis, perverted “tolerasty” and brutal persecution of those who do not agree with those suicidal policies.
Of course with mandatory mawkish politically correct smiles and hidden baseball bats for the case if smiles won’t work.
Petty indignant hypocrisy of “tolerasts” who are hopping mad about things like how russian brutes treat homosexuals or how they spit on human rights is nothing more than a cheap small-time farce for satisfying their dummies henchmen. The only thing that political russophiles care about is pleasure of eternal bolshevik brute.
Their motivations can be different – from treason to imbecile stupidity, but the end is always one and only.
But even if the entire world will go down in red chaos of neo-communist russian occupation, resistance must be. When the hope is dead, dignity still lives. Knowing what russian nightmare is, I won’t let those red bastards a pleasure to get me alive. Bloody bolshevik occupants will come far not to home where everyone is a meek and patient slave, and duty of all free people is to prove it with giving to neo-commies a real Hell.