anti-Semitism, army, Chechnya, commie, communism, Georgia, gulag, Hellstorm, history, Jew, jewish commissars, national socialism, pogrom, rape, revisionism, russia, soviet, subhuman, tsarism, Ukraine, ussr, war crimes, WW2, WWII
Finally, I’ve been able to get my hands on Hellstorm-inspired Revisionism Revised series again – to deal with the most (in)famous revisionist and mainstream boogeymen.
Since the very beginning of my studies, I’ve been always wondering why should one choose extremes of either ideology. Why it’s so hard to stand for reason instead of popular mainstream or underground agenda?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I see most of revisionists keeping blunt National Socialist position, declaring Hitler completely innocent and parroting the contents of 3rd Reich propaganda books. Which ruins the very concept of revisionism that must be based on independent investigation and analysis first of all. Unfortunately, neither any of victorious countries nor the majority of modern seekers of Justice for scapegoated Germans seem to have those, clinging to either official “evil Nazis – 6 millions murdered – glorious victory of the Allies” or underground “Heil Hitler – evil Jews – glorious National Socialism” stereotypes. 70 years have passed and folks continue jumping on the same rakes again and again. Sometimes it’s hard to believe that someone can stick to moldy stereotypes from old propaganda books so ferociously in the age of Internet and open knowledge. Alas.
Here, I’ve made an attempt to debunk the stereotypes of both groups and represent my own opinion about revisionism which might find its own supporters and of course plenty of haters from both camps. (I remember how ruskies were calling me “Yid” because of my refusal to hit on cheap vodka and behave like imbecile goblin, and I know that libtards are calling me “Nazi”, so little can surprise me. Having your own opinion is definitely not the most popular thing in this f#cked-up world.)
MYTH#1: EVIL JEWISH COMMISSARS
This particular NS myth has so much negating evidence that it’s hard to choose where to begin.
I’ve lost count how many times I heard woeful words of hatred targeting infamous commie lackey Ilya Erenburg (by some arcane reason called “one of the most influential men of USSR” in Hellstorm) whose Jewish ethnicity is of course a red flag.
Let’s agree with them for some time and suppose that all Soviet politicians, commissars, NKVD staff, prison guards etc. were Jewish. And that they successfully incited Red Army to kill, rape and pillage. But would YOU butcher a child or gang rape a teenage girl to death if someone says to you it’s OK? Personally I’d prefer to use my sidearm on fun sack of the very “commander” that gives such “orders”. However, most of ruskies turned out to be bitches that obeyed “evil Jewish commissars” without any regret, if not with perverted satisfaction. That scenario seems especially believable considering that ruskies themselves were perfectly happy with HQ that just loved to abuse them, so I guess mutilation of “enemy” civilians was absolutely “normal” in terms of their russian morality and they were perfectly happy with it.
However, there are some inconvenient facts to consider.
Even the most diehard Nazi propagandists can’t incriminate Erenburg with incitement to exercise “revenge” (so favored by mainstream junkies as justification of soviet war crimes) on “brotherly nations”, especially Slavic ones. However, Red Army has been leaving a trail of mass rapes, murders and looting in every country they “liberated”. Fate of many Polish, Ukrainian, Serbian, Yugoslavian women was not better than German ones suffered. Let alone some Jewish and even their own russian female countrymen from “liberated” labor camps. Rapes of Soviet female army staff were so common (unless they were “field-campaign wives” of some commander) throughout the entire war that it wasn’t denied even by some Soviets. But most of them considered such treatment of their own women, or better to say women in general, absolutely “normal”. Reminds you of something?
Of course Erenburg was a Jew. And he indeed was a pouch full of commie shit. But so was and is an every single commie regardless of ethnicity. Erenburg’s lapdog hysteria, even being multiplied by Soviet government-owned media, has barely changed anything in russian mindset seemingly wired for crooked deeds long before he learned how not to crap himself.
The stupidity of some “revisionists” allows them to find “evil Jews” everywhere to shift the blame for all russian wrongdoings on them. For those who disagree, there is always a “Jew/Zionist/Mossad agent” etc label in stock. That could be ridiculous if not sincerely carried out by adult men who have a genuine eye-popping, fire-farting hysteria, labeling anyone whom they don’t like “evil Jews” according to their crooked logic. Or certain donation from Lubyanka, more likely.
Cause it’s hard to find something more convenient to Kremlin than anti-Semitism. Not only turning people away from the revisionism, it also helps true perpetrators to whitewash themselves. At first useful Nazi idiots begin to blame some mysterious “Jewsih bolsheviks” for all troubles in Russia (just like it was during WW2). Then they quote Solzhenytsin (BTW, a devoted ass-kisser of KGB thug Putin, just like Alexeeva and other russian fake dissident windbags) as an example of “poor kind-hearted Russian”. And finally they crank up their street organ with strangely familiar tune that sings how Russians had nothing to do with Soviet crimes, it was all “evil Jews” who did that, and how “Jew Lenin, Jew Stalin” and their bunch of “Jewish” friends destroyed “noble white Mother Russia” and voila – ruskies, by their logic, are completely innocent! Sometimes they aren’t even embarrassed to openly praise commies and condemn anti-communism (Take a look at this screenshot. I don’t think the website with such content deserves promotion by giving direct links, but I’m sure it deserves becoming an example of modern NS logic)!
Well, NO FRIGGIN’ WAY. The facts speak completely otherwise – and no matter which direction we go into History relatively to WW2, the less favorable and believable anti-Semitism looks like.
Sadistic megalomaniac Zhukov was a genuine 100% ruskie yokel born in village named Strelkovshchina – an authentic example of russian thuggish nature, as well as majority of red comissars, prison guards, NKVD staff, felons and all those who were a backbone and muscle of this most criminal regime and country ever. Maybe its “brain” was partially Jewish, but communism and impunity it gives to criminals was just what most of russians wanted with their inner zeal – and finally got in 1917.
If you look into memoirs of Countess Yevfrosiniya Kersnovskaya, Janusz Bardach, Elena Glinka or any other GULAG survivors, you’ll see genuine russians harassing, robbing, gang raping, mutilating and murdering their own countrymen with such a zeal that leaves any “Nazi atrocities” invented by commie propaganda far behind crying in envy. I especially recommend you to find out what was called “Kolyma tram” (or “Kolyma streetcar”).
In modern days there were wars in Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia and currently Ukraine, where ruskies did absolutely the same things as in Europe of 1945 (or sometimes even worse). And when those subhumans have no “enemy” civilians to rape, pillage and kill, they gladly practice their skills on each other during perverted hazing rituals that no other nation could ever think about. Where are Soviet Jewish commissars now? Russia is being ruled by “white nationalist” Putin and his goons, so admired by faux Right useful idiots!
And before the revolution of 1917, it was hard to find a country with higher degree of anti-Semitism than Russian Tsarist Empire. Regular pogroms (ofter accompanied with gang rapes), Black Hundred terror, made-up criminal cases, officially approved discrimination policies and of course fake “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” were daily reality for russian Jewry, many of which were forced to leave the country and never return. However, such treatment of “evil Jews” barely helped Tsarist Russia to become a better place, even for privileged ruskies. In a nutshell, it was thoroughly corrupt, technologically-retarded fundamentalist war-happy tyranny with absolutely no regard for Dignity and Personality, where illiterate, thuggish lowlife serfs were the majority.
An American: “No one can punch me: we have liberty!”
A Russian: “I can punch anyone: we have liberty!”
And it seems to stay that way.
During my studies, I’ve understood a very important thing: a true anti-communism and revisionism end where anti-Semitism begins. And that’s the end of the myth of “Evil Jewish commissars”.
TO BE CONTINUED
Being in terrible need of personal rating boost after total failure of his world domination escapades, KGB thug Putin decided to pull his favorite trick – just like in `99 when his goons bombed apartment blocks in Moscow to start a genocide war in Chechnya and justify restoration of GULAG state. But it would be a grave mistake to call Putin (who remains a small-time street thug despite his presidential status) a forerunner here because terrorism has always been a cornerstone of communism, the most perverse and corrupt ideology which he openly admires and tries to reanimate.
Russian feast is not just eating alone. What a swine one would be just pigging without a proper, highly spiritual entertainment that involves historical memory about past glory?
Like evens of Red Terror, celebrated in Moscow this weekend. Muscovites were especially amused by reconstruction of stalinist arrests, where any patriotic ruskie could try himself in a role of a public enemy in hands of NKVD under cheering and booing of patriotic crowd – all eager to rush towards a new GULAG.
Note a jolly look on faces of “arrested” ruskies. Looks like real-life NKVD thugs (now named as “FSB”) are about to have much trouble with their prisoners choosing a proper torture. No matter how deep a cannon ramrod will be in russian ass or how hard a hand will be nailed to the table, a true patriot of Russia will always meet hardships of Putin’s GULAG as profoundly and thoroughly enjoyable. With “davai-davai” cheering.
commie, communism, corruption, eisenhower, friendship, Hellstorm, history, marshal, politics, red terror, revisionism, russia, russophilia, stalin, thuggery, ussr, viktor suvorov, war, war crimes, WW2, WWII, zhukov
Show me your friends and I will tell you who you are.
An ancient wisdom
Though Hellstorm authors did a thorough job exposing Allied war crimes, their narrative regarding Soviet ones is very facile, bearing resemblance to National Socialist propaganda. Like a horde of mongoloid savages incited by evil Jews with poor russians somewhere in between enduring horrors of war. I’ll return to those stereotypes later; now it’s time for little-known facts about dear friends of western Allies, important not only for understanding who was who in the past. Modern impunity of a terrorist state named Russia is in fact a continuance of things that happened in WW2 – unfortunately, mostly missed in Hellstorm.
Many terrible things are being told in documentary about Dwight Eisenhower. However, not a single word about his warm relations with commies. I can’t understand why Hellstorm authors were so reluctant even to mention Eisenhower’s russian counterpart and dear friend, soviet marshal Georgy Zhukov. Like it was said centuries ago, friends can describe someone as good as personal dossier. The following facts are not classified; they can be found in open sources and books, but most of them remain in original (Russian or Ukrainian) language. As far as I know excellent works by Viktor Suvorov on this matter (“Shadow of Victory”, “Marshal of (Cou)Rage1”) have never been translated into English. Even revisionists pay a little attention to such facts (and that’s one of their biggest mistakes).
Everyone in revisionist community knows about Soviet war crimes in Europe, but very little is known about Soviet war crimes in USSR. A nickname “The Butcher” wasn’t provided to Zhukov for nothing. Even the most vile deeds of Eisenhower look like childish play compared to what Zhukov used to do – with his own people.
Beginning his career in Tsarist Empire cavalry he quickly changed his allegiance in 1918, becoming a Red Army volunteer. After taking part in a number of genocidal raids against own population that opposed Soviet regime (gassing villages, executing peasants during Tambov unrest etc.), he was quickly promoted to Stalin’s favored circle of top dogs where he not only survived so-called “purge” in late 1930s but managed to advance even higher.
Even fellow commie goons were disgusted by Zhukov. Marshals Budyonny, Yeryomenko, Rokossovsky, Vasilevsky, Konev all like one remembered him as power-hungry and violent in their not-so-known notes. And his unlucky subordinates saw nothing more than extremely dumb, often drunk, sadistic perverted narcissistic asshole tyrant with typical thuggish habits of NKVD staff. If Zhukov was inspecting troops in some town, local boys (best friends and admirers of the military) had a non-stop watch to help officers avoid meeting him on the street. Yes, you got it right – officers of the “glorious” Red Army were running away from their own high commander.
In WW2 Zhukov demonstrated a complete lack of any strategic skills that cost his country millions of soldiers, countless amount of resources wasted in chaos of first days of war (thanks to “not answer to provocations” directive) and then catastrophic offensive operations. But he cared a little, openly boasting “we shouldn’t pity soldiers – women will give birth to more!”, if not using cannon fodder tactics to eliminate “enemy” people.
During the battle of Dnipro (Dnieper), that rabid Stalin’s dog ordered to send newly recruited untrained Ukrainians, often without any weapons right on German pillboxes – of course with NKVD SMGs pointed at their backs. And he spoke about that, literally, “Why the fuck we should arm those khokhols? They’re all traitors! The more we’ll drown in Dnieper now, the less we’ll have to deport to Siberia!”
The war still had one more year ahead but red scumbag Zhukov was already planning post-war genocide. His signature was under the order to deport all Ukrainians “familiar with life during German occupation” to Siberia. Crimean Tatars and small Caucasian nations shared the similar fate. Only a catastrophic lack of transport in post-war USSR prevented this from happening as planned.
That was not only one order of such kind signed by red butcher Zhukov. In 1941, he supported execution of hostages from POW families. Anyone captured by Germans was declared a “traitor” and subjected to death sentence (should he return from captivity by any means) as well as POW’s family members. In 1942, punishment was lowered to exile or GULAG term. In practice, some Soviet POWs were falsifying their data in German camps to save their families…
But let’s get back to the battlefield. Or more likely, safe rear where Zhukov preferred to dwell. In final days of the war, a supply truck passed his motorcade in attempt to deliver ammo to the battlefront collapsing before fierce German resistance. Hopping in rage, Zhukov sent his goons to chase and capture unfortunate truck driver, then tore his driving license to little shreds and ordered to, literally, “beat him up, piss on him and throw to ditch!” (Luckily for driver, he was released when rabid Stalin’s dog didn’t stay to watch how such orders will be enforced.)
As a marshal, Zhukov decided to loot like a boss and that’s where he crossed the line of basic russian rule “thou shalt not steal more than thy kingpin”. That could be an epic commie showdown, if not his buddies from high command (according to Victor Suvorov’s opinion, acting in fear of a second “purge” that could be triggered by Zhukov’s arrest). So the glorious thug was silently moved to less influential position with his “hero” status preserved and multiplied for the nation of serfs each new generation, later becoming one of untouchable idols of victory rabies cult that replaced Stalin himself in “history” written by red lackeys.
In 1956, Zhukov participated in suppression of Hungarian anti-communist revolution. For that the bastard was awarded with his 4th “Hero of the Soviet Union” star. He didn’t abandon his love towards butchering of own soldiers as well; in 1954 nuclear weapons have been tested on Soviet army live targets near Totskoye (Ural district) under his direct command.
Ruskies adore to portray their leaders as bearers of titanium balls, much helped by choir of Western dumbasses. Zhukov was no exception, being praised by russophiles for his fake machismo in the same way as now the corrupt Right glorifies thug Putin. And just as him, Zhukov loved to cry like a little girl. The reason could be promotion to lesser position than expected, lack of guests at New Year feast or denial of invitations to party meeting. Titanium balls indeed, as genuine as glorious russian photos and alive WW2 veterans with Tsarist Empire decorations.
Of course such an example of commie virtues was also very chaste in has personal life, preaching morality and family values at every opportunity. And having 4 “wives”, interloping and fighting each other (it’s only what was known for sure). And giving to his “field-campaign wife”2 Lidya Zakharova, officially, a simple nurse, Orders of the Red Star, the Red Banner and lieutenant’s rank (in Soviet medical troops, the highest rank allowed for nurses was a sergeant). Obviously for her moral “purity” of the same kind.
Knowing all that, I feel no slightest surprise being told about war crimes and post-war genocide made by commie-loving Eisenhower and his buddies. I wouldn’t expect anything other from anyone who befriends russian thugs with such a zeal that russophilia becomes a family tradition3. However, I am surprised by stupidity of the West that failed to realize an obvious thing: Regardless of loud statements of the past or mawkish speeches of modern days, it is NOT possible to stand for Justice in coalition with lowlife subhumans that embraced thuggery as a lifestyle. Those who claim otherwise have either no brains or no conscience.
The WW2 indeed was the worst in History, but not because of what Hellstorm authors are saying. It was the worst war in History because it has been waged in alliance with red thugs and in their favor by both of other main belligerents. Because its outcome made red thuggery a sacred cow, giving it right for existence and a free way to all kinds of dirty deals with red mafia state. Because it has allowed red thugs to torture and exterminate enslaved nations in a frenzy of thuggish impunity for many decades. And last but not least – because it created a solid basis for new Red Terror escapades and terrorist campaigns.
All that is result of befriending red thugs.
TO BE CONTINUED
1. Language-specific wordplay. Direct translation would be “Marshal of Trouble”. Russian word for “victory” is “pobeda”, without two first letters this word turns into “trouble” (“beda”) which is often used in jokes, or in this case, in Suvorov’s bitter truth.
2. Soviet slang name for affairs with female army staff.
3. Eisenhower’s granddaughter went even further when she married Roald Sagdeev, whose lapdog efforts to support Soviet repressions are not being concealed even by PC media. (BTW, how did he manage to bypass U.S immigration law that forbids entry for inciting political persecutions?)
commie, crime, dignity, dystopia, EU, Europe, EUSSR, gang, gun ban, gun laws, insanity, law and order, leftist, liberal, libtard, migrant crisis, national socialism, PEGIDA, personality, political correctness, politics, rape, rapefugees, refugee, right-wing, self-defense, socialism, thuggery
“Those who sacrifice Liberty for Security deserve neither.”
I’m completely unsurprised by what’s going on in Europe.
It may be shocking for some people living far away but I’ve been watching it from the inside while trying to stand my ground there. And I saw enough in the past to see now that evil “rapefugee” thugs didn’t come out of nowhere. Neither did their fellow native scumbags (that any nation has) or red mafia comrades. By evident reasons, homegrown, let alone russian thugs and rapists won’t be targeted by RTBS-sputnik-lifenews lapdogs who erupt scary stories about “evil Islamist rapists” on full-auto each new day, trying to get the world’s attention after their miserable failure to paint Ukraine as “evil Nazi junta”. (The most notorious example was a fake story of 13-year-old russian girl Lisa gang-raped by migrants. How russian of them, nation of commie rapists condemns rape. Just like rebuking the very war they started in Ukraine.)
Negative credibility of ruskies is not a subject of discussion – it’s a fact clearly seen by any reasonable person now. Unfortunately, their politically correct “opponents”* aren’t much better in terms of trustworthiness so it can be quite challenging to understand what’s really going on in Europe without any stereotypes made either in Moscow that suddenly chose to stand for Europeans (just like their boy-loving kingpin Putin “protects family values” or their soviet predecessors stood for “peace in entire world”), or Brussels where officials will sing kumbaya even while being raped themselves.
With a simple analysis of open facts from preceding “peaceful” years of EU one can get an evident picture, definitely not favorable for both leftist crowd and their “far-right” opposition underground (that has nothing to do with the true Right**). It doesn’t tell any good about common Europeans either, who most likely will be mad at me for slaying their sacred cows. Well, it’s always easy to label people and be mad at them; to be responsible for own actions is another story. As I was unable to do things in my way in Europe, I have left and didn’t feel a slightest regret since. The following reasoning and conclusions are for those who can understand at least what personality is and consider more things in this world than “happiness-unity-diversity” mantra.
The fact to begin with is, there ARE thugs, rapists, thieves and hoodlums amongst asylum seekers as well as amongst any other group of people taken randomly. But here, right where abuse of facts tends to start, a reasonable man should always ask several simple questions.
1) Isn’t impunity for all criminals one of the most desired liberal dreams?
2) Aren’t foreign thugs sharing the same impunity with native ones in mawkish liberal Europe?
3) Isn’t that attractive for scumbags who won’t think too long about relocation, especially facing incarceration, showdown or lynching in their homeland? (If non-violent Hindus are getting THAT angry at rapists, it’s easy to imagine what can happen in some Islamic country…)
4) Wasn’t the current state of affairs a result of long-term policy and who is responsible then?
Non-violence always was a liberal’s favorite trump card. Who can resist promises to live in paradise where one doesn’t need to worry about prevention of crime and safety is guaranteed by the Big Wise State? Who needs to enforce Law and Order and be vigilant when everybody loves each other? Only some moldy, trigger-happy cowboys and their southern bandido Latino neighbors that can never understand the joy and enlightenment of EU. Too bad it didn’t work for Europeans when real challenges came around.
No proof is required to understand that trouble is bound to bring most disastrous results when the people are unprepared to face it, either physically or emotionally; matters can be worsened even further by renouncing rational course of action for the sake of political agenda. Which is exactly what European leftists have done in fanatical attempts to create a fake image of borderless hippie utopia.
In Europe, any perpetrator that commits a typical crime against personality (rape, assault, battery) is granted with, first of all, street impunity. Not only common people are disarmed, thus having no chance against gorilla-sized thug (or a bunch of not so big thugs). Even improvised non-lethal self-defense is criminalized in oh-so-humane Europe that apparently values scum more than honest people. And that has begun not just recently; reports from years back are showing the same pattern of thuggery encouraged by impunity. Hit a booze, team up with buddies of the same degenerate kind and beat someone who can’t respond.
While the citizens have no right for self-defense, police forces are unable, unwilling or forbidden to fight ANY thuggery effectively, not just Islamic or African one. A few people remember about commie protests in France of 1968 – very similar to modern European riots. With the same purpose of getting free stuff and impunity, but a little difference: the protesters were ethnic Frenchmen. And back then, the Gendarmerie failed as miserably as they did in 2005. Or doing it every day, plain and simple, just doing nothing in their fancy uniforms as most of their EU colleagues.
As final warranty of impunity, there is always kid gloves treatment in courts, race card defense if applicable (if not, “human feelings” of scumbag work just fine) and (better to say, IF the case ends in prison term) incarceration conditions comparable to some kind of resort hotel. Even for mass murderers and terrorists. So I think the first two questions above had been thoroughly answered – there is nothing “inside-out-Nazi” with European migrant crisis. All scumbags are equally happy in libtard dystopia named EU, regardless of their skin color. Third question is mostly a rhetorical one. Of course European migration policy sucks – bit does it alone or there is something much more serious?
Regardless of what PC crowd is chanting, democracy reflects national character of its people, not the same in two different countries. My readers should know already that I came to South America after leaving EU. There is enough of libtards and power-hungry wannabe tzars but living in several of its countries I’ve never faced thuggery like in oh-so-civilized Europe, despite all that bandido Latino image (created mostly by scaremonger media and slum-dwelling gringo backpackers). Of course South America has its own flaws but its main and ultimate superiority in comparison to politically correct Europe is that people do not find it fancy to be miserable. Impoverishment is a problem indeed but not a fetish, unlike in EU, where the natives absolutely voluntarily renounce powerful electronics, household appliances, accessible fast food, cars… What’s worse, where Latinos don’t give a damn or openly spit on liberal inventions, Europeans sing in sheeple choir “Baa baa, this is good for us!” gladly bowing to any insane will of liberals or just being afraid to be labeled as “moldy chauvinists”.
I’ve mentioned non-political stuff not without a reason and not for the first time. I wouldn’t expect much of resolve from someone who enjoys to be miserable at home. Hippie-minded Europeans were coming towards what they have now at full throttle (or better to say, pushing pedals like crazy), electing liberal tzar officials and politicians who at first disarmed the population, then banned basic things that every free and reasonable man should possess, then turned simple stuff into caste privileges and finally made everyone into miserable walking targets. Now Europeans are complaining to government about the very results of their own course of action, having in fact no one to blame but themselves. If one not only finds it fancy to be miserable and defenseless, but also prevents those who still have some brains left from straightening out the situation (it’s enough to look at any forum where anti-gun, anti-car, Evil Global Warming fanatics face people from America to see all European hatred towards a lifestyle not dictated by libtards), he has to prepare for consequences. Like living in Orwellian dystopia where Personality is a foreign term and someone is more equal than others.
Speaking of Personality, I see no faction in modern EU that could show a true respect towards it. On the left, there are commie fanatics labeling as “Nazi” anyone not agreed with their insane suicidal projects. On the other side (supposed to be right), a bunch of National Socialists dreaming of Great Wise State that should care about the people and banish all the criminals. And between them, a huge liberal crowd chanting “non-violence” slogans, trying to fight troubles with flowers, teddy bears and clown attire.
They have differences indeed but all three ideologies share the same leftist contempt towards a single most important thing: Dignity of a Personality not enveloped by stereotypical crowd. And the same leftist love affairs with Moscow. Therefore I do not see any chance to reclaim Law and Order in modern Europe where the last representatives of true Right were Lech Kaczynski and his Government, murdered by Putin’s thugs with much aid from lackeys of Moscow.
Without getting rid of pathologically leftist, insane self-humiliating mindset, Europeans aren’t going to do anything with, let’s finally call the thing with its own name, rampant street thuggery. Let alone international thuggery, especially one that comes out of Kremlin and BTW has A LOT to do with refugee crisis in the West.
*Just remember who were the best friends of thug Putin before the Maidan Revolution.
**Before trying to object, find at least one European faction that stands for the laws in favor of Personality (like small Government, armed self-defense, castle doctrine, Stand Your Ground rule, easy driving license regulations, promotion of little businesses…) and doesn’t share Moscow love affairs with their PC rivals.
The aforementioned facts create an easy impression that 3rd Reich and USSR were equally evil. Equally totalitarian, anti-human, militarist countries, so it was OK to help any of those two to eradicate another one without much difference. Even in such case it doesn’t speak very high of Western politicians who considered it possible to make a deal with either side, leaving entire nations to mercy of evil chosen by a bunch of smart-ass analysts; but the real matters were much more hideous and vile than that.
No ideology can exist, let alone be researched in pure paper form. Unfortunately, the latter is exactly what historians (both mainstream and revisionist) are trying to bring about in their studies and politicians are using as cornerstone for all real-life actions. Meanwhile, the truth is so simple and natural that most people fail to see it, seeking for complex theories instead of perceiving the reality as it is. Or was.
All emotions aside, let’s compare the good, the bad and the ugly things in 3rd Reich and USSR.
Used to incarcerate and eliminate political opponents, evident Jews and gypsies.1
Used to eliminate entire “enemy” society classes and ethnicities, outstanding individuals or just anyone caught to meet the plan2.
Self-made man. Military veteran. Political prisoner.
Habitual felon without any proper education or military career.
Anything not hostile to official doctrine was tolerated.
Not praising official doctrine or even non-reporting disagreement with it was enough for prison term.3
Private property. Private ownership of means of production.
“No private property” doctrine. All means of production belonged to state. Farm ownership was effectively banned.4
Always punished by GULAG terms or death.
Selectively-restrictive, banning weapon possession for Jews.
Restrictive, banning private possession of all handguns6
(w/o death camps)
No famine cases known
Artificially created, regular famine as communist method of holding the power
Rapid advance thanks to (then) famous German engineering and favoring regulations.
Forced industrialization that relied on slave labor. Traditional lagging in terms of quality and reliability.
Experiments on humans
Carried out with a purpose to create superior soldiers.
Carried out with a purpose to create ape-human hybrid.7
To create a great European empire for Germans and their allies without regard to “inferior” nations.
World domination a.k.a. “World revolution”
An ideal citizen
“Aryan” human being granted with superior physical abilities and beauty, loyal to his/her country and leader.
1. Passports in 3rd Reich had no “ethnicity” mark, unlike in USSR. Many not-so-evident (by appearance and given name) Jews have been able to avoid persecution, enlist the military or even help the regime serving in police forces. Now those facts are abused in all ways possible by sensation-happy conspiracy theorists.
Moreover, before coming to “final solution” Nazis tried different ways to banish “unwanted” people from Germany. In contrast to that, commies practiced ultimate eradication of “public enemies” since 1917.
2. There was a plan for everything in USSR. Even for number of “public enemies” to be arrested and executed (top secret evidence, very unpleasant for ruskies and their comrades).
3. Soviet laws determined “non-reporting of anti-soviet speeches and activities” (virtually anything could be interpreted as the latter) as act of treason punishable by long-term GULAG incarceration.
4. Peasants, forced into kolkhoz, were forbidden to have a passport until 1974. In fact that was restoration of serfdom with full state monopoly.
5. The most noticeable example was protest of German women married to Jews at Rosenstraße, Berlin in 1943. Not only the protesters avoided any harm; their arrested husbands were granted full amnesty.
6. The handgun ban enforced by bolsheviks still remains in effect in modern Russia.
7. When the relevance and usefulness of such subhuman “experiments” became obsolete, the Soviets switched to experimenting on human brains, most likely with the same purpose. Try to use a Web translator on this unique material if you can’t read Russian.
Did you notice that columns aren’t named “National Socialism” and “Communism?”
Like I said, there is no bare ideology without people who follow it. And here, we see a very interesting (and very politically incorrect) thing: even creating evil totalitarian regimes, not all nations are doing it in the same way. That’s why population of territories once conquered by Soviets (Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Caucasus) was greeting advancing Germans and many people willingly joined the Wehrmacht or even SS troops. Racial theory was the last thing they were thinking about. I’ll return to that matter later on.
Knowing no words of Conscience and Honor, Stalin was about to act just like in times of his political career when he backstabbed his way to the top. One must admit that Germans were smart and brave enough to strike first facing imminent threat of red invasion***, therefore saving at least the Western Europe from being completely overrun by red thugs but again, it’s hardly a merit of Stalin-loving, russophilic Nazi administration that planned co-existence with USSR. Being inferior in numbers but far more superior in skills and morale, Germans almost brought an end to enemy of all humankind – unfortunately, saved by corruption of Allied powers. And by “corruption” here I do not mean fighting against Hitler’s regime (like many revisionists do). I mean fighting in favor of Stalin’s regime of congenital thugs and subhumans.
*** Suvorov’s “Ice-breaker” is the best piece of analysis here. However, there are many other mutually independent sources like memoirs of German soldiers or civilian witnesses that confirm the fact of Soviet offense preparations.
Western naivete never ceases to amaze.
It’s hard to find an expert that wasn’t delighted with sanctions as ingenious attempt to stop Kremlin’s world domination campaign. According to mainstream opinion, people of Russia should become enraged by shortage of quality foods enough to end thug Putin’s regime with some kind of Salami Revolution.
It’s indeed fancy to build castles in the air, running utopia errands without a personal responsibility for consequences. Like in 1990s, when jolly pioneers of Western democracy rushed towards ruins of evil empire to teach ruskies how to choose own rulers. To say it ended up in a disaster would be an underestimating.
In either case, trouble is caused by excluding basic facts from consideration – mostly because of mainstream stereotypes that forbid speaking the truth about “people that helped to defeat Nazism”. But why really? By all definitions, the fact of “victory” does not and CAN NOT guarantee moral superiority per se. (And BTW Nazism is very popular in modern Russia where it has mutated into truly russian form.)
Returning to the topic, not every nation has the same consumerist (social) priorities. Some don’t have those at all, except for cheap booze (or GULAG pigsty). That’s why Western fancy theories fail so often in russian reality.
Recent regulations that ruskies enforced in response to Western sanctions not only ban import of certain groceries. Now, it is also forbidden to consume blacklisted foods even if they were smuggled to Russia somehow. If discovered, they are subject to disposal. Like that.
It Tatarstan, glorious and vigilant russian police managed to stop evil Hungarian geese from bringing pleasure to some unpatriotic customers who still dare to disobey bans imposed by Great Wise Leader.
Meanwhile in russian supermarkets:
A page from the memoir that you should already know about by now shows huge piles of corn confiscated from farmers, rotting under open sky in Bessarabia (East Romania). This happened shortly after its annexation by russian thugs in 1940.
The following pages show us what happened in famine-ridden Siberia in 1942 – far away from the frontline.
Another commie scumbag (“teacher” by the way) teaches little ruskies how to be a true patriot. Burning down unharvested fields was a common wartime practice, while red bullshitters were going full-auto about “hunger” and “wartime shortage” both for domestic and international auditoriums to have a bunch of useful anti-Nazi idiots singing to their tune. And of course, always having luxury groceries for commie top dogs during starvation in Leningrad. I don’t think Nazis could even hold a candle to such an “art” of transgression against own people. Who, BTW, in case of Russia always faced it with dumb conformism, if not fanatical support. Speaking of which…
A flashback from History. Proud commie serfs are protesting against humanitarian aid from West Germany. Their slogan says “It’s better to have russian crust of bread than a chunk of fatty meat from FRG!”
Modern days again. A good friend of mine sent me this photo made in Moscow. Those dumpster divers are NOT bums; actually, they are happy supporters of neo-soviet thuggery. Such patriotic dumpster diving can be observed near almost every waste food site in Moscow (near supermarkets etc). They prefer to eat waste rather than live in dignity, respecting neighbors. Like they preferred to leave orphans for certain death rather than letting “decadent West” to adopt them.
Since long ago, I’ve been telling the truth about this nation of commie thugs despite all asslicking trend. Now it is coming out the hard way. Having an option to start evil empire restoration which ruskies consider an only way to be “great”, they would gladly exchange everything they have for a bleak chance to shit all over the world. But most likely, death somewhere in fields of a free Ukraine and dog’s burial. Or fatal poisoning with garbage “food”, often dangerous for consumption even in its shelf phase. Or existence worse than death – for a human being, of course. A true russian never complains if everyone has to starve or eat shit! (And never asks why government has luxury imported groceries despite all anti-Western hysteria and let’s-eat-shit-for-russia campaign, or why spawn of thug Putin and his lackeys is living in “enemy” countries.)
Well, if ruskies want to die for their kingpin (who deserves gallows by any civilized laws) together with insane world domination plans embedded in their essence, we the reasonable people can only greet such a will and should help them in any way possible.
One and only true RTBS-English dictionary. No political correctness, no mainstream, no censorship or popular restrictions. With it, you will never feel lost even in a crowd of brainwashed RTBS junkies!
Alternative (viewpoint, opinion, etc.)
Calling duck a pig and hopping mad when someone says that pigs can’t fly.
The same as “Nazi thug” but of Ukrainian origin.
One-way war executed by Russia.
Decadent West/Extremist East
Any country a bit cleaner than russian shithole.
Cheating, boorishness, mockery.
Any russian citizen who doesn’t lick Putin’s ass.
Complete denial of any human morality or law standards.
Great Patriotic War
Part of WW2, where bigger evil named communism devoured lesser evil named Nazism.
Fiction written by bolshevist lackeys.
Military assistance for russian terrorists, disguised as humanitarian cargo.
Annexation made by Russia.
Any government planning national defense against russian invasion.
Backed by Russia.
Any russian citizen who doesn’t want KGB thug Putin in office.
Anyone who opposes Russia.
Anyone able to fight against russian invasion.
Russian variant of ISIS.
Opposition (inside Russia)
Kremlin-approved jesters who regularly lead dumb russian herd under police batons.
Worshiping KGB and lowlife scumbags dressed as priests.
Agreement with some dumb Western politicians who end up like anyone trusting a thug – beaten, robbed and mocked.
Will to catch a bullet and be buried like a dog for own slavery and kingpin’s luxury existence. Or lose some limbs, return home and beg for change to buy vodka.
Invasion war won by Russia.
Protection of children (against homosexuals)
Exclusive right of native russian perverts to molest and abuse russian children.
Protection of russian-speaking population
Reasonless invasion war, genocide of all non-putinists (including russians) by terrorism and thuggery.
Voting at the wrong end of AK barrel.
GULAG lifestyle extended to entire society.
Attempt to enforce “russian world” somewhere.
A non-translatable mix of swine grunting, ape screams, prison slang diluted with profanities.
Persistence of “russian world” and personal safety of KGB asses.
Anyone who fights a guerrilla war against russian invaders.
Common russian activities (drinking cheap booze, whacking each other, sleeping in own drunken vomit and mating with drunk Natasha or drunk Emelya when there is no natasha available).
Anything approved by Putin’s dogs.
Actions against thuggery.
1. Consequences of russian invasion. 2. Imaginary events existing within russian mind exclusively (crucified boy, butchered bullfinches, Banderovite tortures, etc).
Any reasonable Western politician who considers russian commie thuggery inappropriate and tries to call for REAL resistance.